1 | % (c) 2020-2024 Lehrstuhl fuer Softwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen, | |
2 | % Heinrich Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf | |
3 | % This software is licenced under EPL 1.0 (http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html | |
4 | ||
5 | :- module(well_def_analyser, [analyse_wd_for_machine/3, analyse_wd_for_machine/4, | |
6 | compute_wd/4, compute_all_wd_pos/4, | |
7 | analyse_wd_for_expr/3, analyse_wd_for_expr/4, | |
8 | annotate_wd/2, transform_wd/4, | |
9 | tcltk_get_machine_wd_pos/4, | |
10 | get_hyps_for_top_level_operations/2, | |
11 | prove_sequent/1, | |
12 | prove_sequent/3, | |
13 | prove_sequent/4, | |
14 | analyse_invariants_for_machine/5, | |
15 | find_inconsistent_axiom/3, tcltk_check_for_inconsistent_axiom/1, | |
16 | toplevel_wd_pos/3 | |
17 | ]). | |
18 | ||
19 | :- use_module(probsrc(module_information),[module_info/2]). | |
20 | :- module_info(group,well_def_prover). | |
21 | :- module_info(description,'This module computes WD conditions in AST.'). | |
22 | ||
23 | :- use_module(probsrc(error_manager)). | |
24 | :- use_module(probsrc(debug)). | |
25 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree)). | |
26 | :- use_module(probsrc(b_ast_cleanup), [has_top_level_wd_condition/1]). | |
27 | :- use_module(probsrc(external_functions),[external_fun_has_wd_condition/1]). | |
28 | :- use_module(probsrc(specfile),[z_or_tla_minor_mode/0, eventb_mode/0]). | |
29 | ||
30 | :- use_module(library(ordsets)). | |
31 | :- use_module(library(avl)). | |
32 | :- use_module(wdsrc(well_def_hyps)). | |
33 | ||
34 | ||
35 | prove_sequent(Goal) :- | |
36 | prove_sequent(proving,Goal,[]). | |
37 | prove_sequent(Context,Goal,Hyps) :- | |
38 | prove_sequent(Context,Goal,Hyps,[push_more_hyps]). % push all hypotheses; usually not useful for WD proofs but useful if proof goals have other form than for WD POs | |
39 | prove_sequent(Context,Goal,Hyps,Opts) :- | |
40 | (Context=animation -> Val=true | |
41 | ; Context=proving -> Val=false | |
42 | ; add_internal_error('Unknown context:',Context), | |
43 | Val=false), | |
44 | temporary_set_preference(wd_analysis_for_animation,Val,Chng), | |
45 | call_cleanup(prove_sequent_cur_context(Goal,Hyps,Opts), | |
46 | reset_temporary_preference(wd_analysis_for_animation,Chng)). | |
47 | ||
48 | ||
49 | % utility for disprover | |
50 | prove_sequent_cur_context(_,Hyps,_) :- | |
51 | member(Falsity,Hyps), is_falsity(Falsity),!. % TO DO: upon pushing hyps | |
52 | prove_sequent_cur_context(Goal,Hypotheses,Opts) :- | |
53 | empty_hyps(E), | |
54 | list_to_ord_set([discharge_po|Opts],Options), | |
55 | push_hyps(E,Hypotheses,Options,Hyps), | |
56 | prove_sequent_goal(Goal,Hyps,Options). | |
57 | ||
58 | % process complex sequent goals which arise in Rodin; not generated by our POG | |
59 | prove_sequent_goal(b(Formula,pred,I),Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
60 | process_sequent_aux(Formula,I,Hyps,Options). | |
61 | prove_sequent_goal(Goal,Hyps,Options) :- | |
62 | add_internal_error('Goal not wrapped: ',prove_sequent_goal(Goal,Hyps,Options)),fail. | |
63 | ||
64 | process_sequent_aux(negation(b(Pred,pred,_)),I,Hyps,Options) :- cnf_negate(Pred,NegPred),!, | |
65 | (debug_mode(off) -> true | |
66 | ; print('Pushing negation in sequent goal: '), translate:print_bexpr(b(NegPred,pred,[])),nl), | |
67 | % example :prove x=3 => not( x=3 => x=2) | |
68 | process_sequent_aux(NegPred,I,Hyps,Options). | |
69 | process_sequent_aux(implication(A,B),_,Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
70 | (debug_mode(off) -> true ; print('Peeling implication in sequent goal: '), translate:print_bexpr(A),nl), | |
71 | push_hyp(Hyps,A,Options,Hyps1), | |
72 | (prove_sequent_goal(B,Hyps1,Options) -> true | |
73 | ; negate_hyp(A,NegA), | |
74 | negate_hyp(B,NegB), push_hyp(Hyps,NegB,Options,Hyps2), % try not(B) => not(A) | |
75 | debug_println(19,trying_to_prove_contrapositive), | |
76 | prove_sequent_goal(NegA,Hyps2,Options) | |
77 | ). | |
78 | process_sequent_aux(equivalence(A,B),I,Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
79 | process_sequent_aux(implication(A,B),I,Hyps,Options), | |
80 | process_sequent_aux(implication(B,A),I,Hyps,Options). | |
81 | process_sequent_aux(conjunct(A,B),_I,Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
82 | prove_sequent_goal(A,Hyps,Options), | |
83 | prove_sequent_goal(B,Hyps,Options). | |
84 | process_sequent_aux(disjunct(A,B),_I,Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
85 | (negate_hyp(B,NegB), | |
86 | push_hyp(Hyps,NegB,Options,Hyps2), % not(B) => A we have A or B ; OR_R rule from Abrial Event-B Chapter 9.2.2 | |
87 | % is a combination of OR_R proof rule and proof by case B, not(B) | |
88 | prove_sequent_goal(A,Hyps2,Options) | |
89 | -> true | |
90 | ; % not sure if it will really be often successful to try this branch if the first one failed | |
91 | negate_hyp(A,NegA), | |
92 | push_hyp(Hyps,NegA,Options,Hyps2), % not(A) => B we have A or B | |
93 | prove_sequent_goal(B,Hyps2,Options)). | |
94 | process_sequent_aux(forall(Ids,A,B),I,Hyps,Options) :- !, | |
95 | (debug_mode(off) -> true ; print('Peeling forall in sequent goal: '), translate:print_bexpr(A),nl), | |
96 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,Ids,Hyps1), | |
97 | prove_sequent_goal(b(implication(A,B),pred,I),Hyps1,Options). | |
98 | process_sequent_aux(Goal,I,Hyps,Options) :- | |
99 | get_normalized_and_renamed_predicate(b(Goal,pred,I),Hyps,_RenTarget,NT), | |
100 | % print('PROVING: '),translate:print_bexpr(_RenTarget),nl, | |
101 | (get_current_po_label(POLabel,Options) -> true ; POLabel = ''), | |
102 | prove_proof_obligation(POLabel,Goal,NT,Hyps,ProofTree), | |
103 | debug_format(19,'WD PROVER SUCCESSFUL: ~w~n',[ProofTree]). | |
104 | ||
105 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree),[create_negation/2]). | |
106 | cnf_negate(implication(A,B),conjunct(A,NotB)) :- create_negation(B,NotB). | |
107 | cnf_negate(equivalence(A,B),conjunct(b(implication(A,NotB),pred,[]), | |
108 | b(implication(NotA,B),pred,[]))) :- | |
109 | % not( A <=> B ) <----> A=> not(B) & not(A) => B | |
110 | create_negation(A,NotA), | |
111 | create_negation(B,NotB). | |
112 | cnf_negate(disjunct(A,B),conjunct(NotA,NotB)) :- create_negation(A,NotA), create_negation(B,NotB). | |
113 | cnf_negate(conjunct(A,B),disjunct(NotA,NotB)) :- create_negation(A,NotA), create_negation(B,NotB). | |
114 | cnf_negate(NegA,A) :- negate_op(NegA,A). % deals with negation(A) -> A, truth->falsity, ... | |
115 | %cnf_negate(exists(Ids,Q),forall(Ids,LHS,RHS)) :- ... TODO | |
116 | ||
117 | compute_all_wd_pos(TExpr,OriginalHyps,Options,POs) :- | |
118 | findall(PO, compute_wd(TExpr,OriginalHyps,Options,PO), POs). | |
119 | ||
120 | ||
121 | % analyze and print WD POs for a given typed expression or predicate or subst: | |
122 | analyse_wd_for_expr(TExpr,_,_) :- | |
123 | analyse_wd_for_expr(TExpr,_,_,silent). | |
124 | ||
125 | % MsgLevel = silent, message, warning, error | |
126 | analyse_wd_for_expr(TExpr,_,_,MsgLevel) :- | |
127 | reset_stats, | |
128 | (silent_wd_mode(MsgLevel) -> true ; formatsilent('WD Proof Obligations:~n',[])), | |
129 | %empty_hyps(OriginalHyps), | |
130 | push_properties_invariant_hyps([],OriginalHyps), | |
131 | list_to_ord_set([create_full_po,create_not_discharged_msg(MsgLevel),discharge_po,ignore_wd_infos | |
132 | %,minimize_full_po | |
133 | %,prove_with_z3 % comment in to double-check with Z3 | |
134 | ],Options), | |
135 | compute_wd(TExpr,OriginalHyps,Options,PO), | |
136 | (silent_wd_mode(MsgLevel) -> true ; translate:nested_print_bexpr(PO),nl), | |
137 | fail. | |
138 | analyse_wd_for_expr(TExpr,ResStr,AllDischarged,MsgLevel) :- | |
139 | (silent_wd_mode(MsgLevel) -> true | |
140 | ; formatsilent('----~n',[]), | |
141 | print_stats | |
142 | ), | |
143 | get_discharged_result(ResStr,_,_,AllDischarged), | |
144 | empty_hyps(OriginalHyps), | |
145 | transform_wd(TExpr,OriginalHyps,[discharge_po],NewTExpr), | |
146 | (silent_wd_mode(MsgLevel) -> true | |
147 | ; format('Annotated formula:~n',[]), | |
148 | nested_print_wd_bexpr(NewTExpr) | |
149 | ). | |
150 | ||
151 | silent_wd_mode(MsgLevel) :- (MsgLevel=silent -> true ; silent_mode(on)). | |
152 | ||
153 | nested_print_wd_bexpr(NewTExpr) :- | |
154 | temporary_set_preference(pp_wd_infos,true,Chng), | |
155 | translate:nested_print_bexpr(NewTExpr),nl, | |
156 | reset_temporary_preference(pp_wd_infos,Chng). | |
157 | ||
158 | :- use_module(probsrc(translate),[translate_bexpression_with_limit/3]). | |
159 | ||
160 | tcltk_get_machine_wd_pos(only_goal,list([Header|POs]),ResStr,AllDischarged) :- !, | |
161 | reset_stats, | |
162 | Header = list(['PO Label','Discharged','Proof Obligation Goal', 'Source']), | |
163 | list_to_ord_set([discharge_po,ignore_wd_infos,reorder_conjuncts],Options), | |
164 | findall(list([POLabel,Discharged,POStr,Source]), | |
165 | (get_machine_wd_po(Options,PO,PO_Name), | |
166 | get_texpr_info(PO,Infos), | |
167 | (member(discharged(D,POLabel),Infos) | |
168 | -> (D=true -> Discharged='yes' ; Discharged='no') | |
169 | ; Discharged='UNKNOWN',POLabel=PO_Name), | |
170 | translate:translate_bexpression_with_limit(PO,100,POStr), | |
171 | get_tk_table_position_info(Infos,Source) | |
172 | ), POs), | |
173 | get_discharged_result(ResStr,_,_,AllDischarged). | |
174 | tcltk_get_machine_wd_pos(goal_and_hyps,list([Header|POs]),ResStr,AllDischarged) :- | |
175 | reset_stats, | |
176 | get_preference(translation_limit_for_table_commands,Limit), | |
177 | Header = list(['PO Label','Discharged','PO Goal', '(Necessary) Hypotheses', 'Source']), | |
178 | % in case a PO is proven we only show the hyps necessary for the proof | |
179 | list_to_ord_set([discharge_po,ignore_wd_infos,reorder_conjuncts, create_full_po,minimize_full_po],Options), | |
180 | findall(list([POLabel,Discharged,GoalStr,HypsStr,Source]), | |
181 | (get_machine_wd_po(Options,PO,PO_Name), | |
182 | get_texpr_info(PO,Infos), | |
183 | (member(discharged(D,POLabel),Infos) | |
184 | -> (D=true -> Discharged='yes' ; Discharged='no') | |
185 | ; Discharged='UNKNOWN',POLabel=PO_Name), | |
186 | decompose_po(PO,Hyps,Goal), | |
187 | translate_bexpression_with_limit(Hyps,Limit,HypsStr), | |
188 | translate_bexpression_with_limit(Goal,Limit,GoalStr), | |
189 | get_tk_table_position_info(Infos,Source) | |
190 | ), POs), | |
191 | get_discharged_result(ResStr,_,_,AllDischarged). | |
192 | ||
193 | decompose_po(b(implication(Hyps,Goal),pred,_),Hyps,Goal) :- !. | |
194 | decompose_po(Goal,b(truth,pred,[]),Goal). | |
195 | ||
196 | % analyse all WD POs for the loaded B machine | |
197 | analyse_wd_for_machine(NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged) :- | |
198 | Options = [create_not_discharged_msg(warning),discharge_po,ignore_wd_infos,reorder_conjuncts], | |
199 | analyse_wd_for_machine(NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged,Options). | |
200 | analyse_wd_for_machine_with_double_check(NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged) :- | |
201 | Options = [create_not_discharged_msg(warning),discharge_po,ignore_wd_infos,reorder_conjuncts, | |
202 | create_full_po, prove_with_z3], | |
203 | analyse_wd_for_machine(NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged,Options). | |
204 | ||
205 | analyse_wd_for_machine(NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged,UnsortedOptions) :- reset_stats, | |
206 | list_to_ord_set(UnsortedOptions,Options), | |
207 | %list_to_ord_set([discharge_po,reorder_conjuncts],Options), | |
208 | statistics(walltime,[Start,_]), | |
209 | ( get_machine_wd_po(Options,_PO,_), | |
210 | fail | |
211 | ; | |
212 | statistics(walltime,[Stop,_]), Delta is Stop-Start, | |
213 | formatsilent('Analysis walltime: ~w ms~n',[Delta]), | |
214 | print_stats, | |
215 | get_discharged_result(_ResStr,NrDischarged,NrTot,Discharged) | |
216 | ). | |
217 | ||
218 | :- use_module(probsrc(bmachine), [b_get_properties_from_machine/1, b_get_machine_all_constants/1, | |
219 | b_get_machine_variables/1, b_get_invariant_from_machine/1, | |
220 | b_get_static_assertions_from_machine/1, b_get_dynamic_assertions_from_machine/1, | |
221 | b_get_machine_operation/6, b_get_initialisation_from_machine/2]). | |
222 | ||
223 | transl_hyp(Axiom,Str) :- | |
224 | translate:translate_bexpression_with_limit(Axiom,500,Str). | |
225 | ||
226 | % if successful: returns a message explaining that an axiom is in contradiction with some other properties | |
227 | tcltk_check_for_inconsistent_axiom(list(['The following predicate from PROPERTIES/axioms:',AxiomStr, | |
228 | 'is in contradiction with these predicates:' | TPS])) :- | |
229 | find_inconsistent_axiom([],Axiom,NecHyps), | |
230 | %get_specification_description(properties,PS), | |
231 | translate:translate_bexpression_with_limit(Axiom,500,AxiomStr), | |
232 | maplist(transl_hyp,NecHyps,TPS). | |
233 | ||
234 | % try to find inconsistency in properties/axioms: | |
235 | find_inconsistent_axiom(LOpt,Axiom,NecHyps) :- | |
236 | reset_stats, | |
237 | get_fresh_hyps_for_constants(OriginalHyps), | |
238 | b_get_properties_from_machine(Properties), | |
239 | list_to_ord_set([push_more_hyps|LOpt],Options), | |
240 | push_hyp(OriginalHyps,Properties,Options,Hyps1), | |
241 | member_in_conjunction(Axiom,Properties), | |
242 | (debug_mode(on) -> print(' checking for contradiction with ==> '),translate:print_bexpr(Axiom),nl ; true), | |
243 | NegAxiom = b(negation(Axiom),pred,[]), | |
244 | prove_sequent_goal(NegAxiom,Hyps1,Options), | |
245 | print('INCONSISTENCY FOUND, negation of axiom can be proven: '), | |
246 | translate:print_bexpr(Axiom),nl, | |
247 | % ord_member(minimize_full_po,Options), | |
248 | print('Finding NECESSARY Hypotheses:'),nl, | |
249 | minimize_necessary_hyps(Hyps1,NegAxiom,Options,NecHyps), | |
250 | (debug_mode(on) -> translate:nested_print_bexpr(NecHyps),nl ; true). | |
251 | %TODO: optionally take prob-ignore into account (predicate_has_ignore_pragma/1 and get_preference(use_ignore_pragmas,true)) | |
252 | ||
253 | minimize_necessary_hyps(hyp_rec(AvlNH,_),Goal,Options,NecHyps) :- | |
254 | avl_range(AvlNH,Hyps), | |
255 | minimize_hyps(Hyps,Goal,Options,NecHyps). | |
256 | ||
257 | ||
258 | get_fresh_hyps_for_constants(OriginalHyps) :- | |
259 | empty_hyps(E), | |
260 | b_get_machine_all_constants(Csts), | |
261 | add_new_hyp_variables(E,Csts,OriginalHyps). | |
262 | ||
263 | % get POs for loaded B machine | |
264 | get_machine_wd_po(LOpt,PO,PO_Name) :- | |
265 | reset_stats, | |
266 | list_to_ord_set(LOpt,Options), | |
267 | b_get_properties_from_machine(Properties), | |
268 | % TO DO: move Conjuncts without WD condition to front in first pass | |
269 | get_fresh_hyps_for_constants(OriginalHyps), | |
270 | ( PO_Name = 'AXM', | |
271 | debug_format(19,'Checking WD of PROPERTIES~n',[]), | |
272 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
273 | compute_wd_with_reordering(Properties,OriginalHyps,Opt2,PO) | |
274 | ||
275 | %debug:time(well_def_analyser:transform_wd(Properties,OriginalHyps,Opt2,NewProperties)),nl,fail) | |
276 | ||
277 | ; % TO DO: for transform: only use assertions if assertion checking is on!? | |
278 | ||
279 | push_hyp(OriginalHyps,Properties,Options,Hyps1), | |
280 | b_get_static_assertions_from_machine(StaticAssertions), | |
281 | ||
282 | ( PO_Name = 'THM-AXM', | |
283 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
284 | conjunct_predicates(StaticAssertions,SAssPred), | |
285 | compute_wd(SAssPred,Hyps1,Opt2,PO) | |
286 | ; | |
287 | push_hyps(Hyps1,StaticAssertions,Options,Hyps2), | |
288 | %portray_hyps(Hyps2),nl, | |
289 | b_get_machine_variables(Vars), | |
290 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps2,Vars,Hyps3), | |
291 | b_get_invariant_from_machine(Invariant), | |
292 | ( PO_Name = 'INV', | |
293 | debug_format(19,'Checking WD of INVARIANT~n',[]), | |
294 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
295 | compute_wd_with_reordering(Invariant,Hyps3,Opt2,PO) | |
296 | ; | |
297 | push_hyp(Hyps3,Invariant,Options,Hyps4), | |
298 | b_get_dynamic_assertions_from_machine(DynAssertions), | |
299 | ( PO_Name = 'THM-INV', | |
300 | debug_format(19,'Checking WD of ASSERTIONS~n',[]), | |
301 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
302 | conjunct_predicates(DynAssertions,AssPred), | |
303 | compute_wd(AssPred,Hyps4,Opt2,PO) | |
304 | % TO DO: use assertions for operations | |
305 | ; push_hyps(Hyps4,DynAssertions,Options,Hyps5), | |
306 | ( | |
307 | b_get_initialisation_from_machine(Body,_OType), | |
308 | PO_Name = 'INIT', | |
309 | debug_format(19,'Checking WD of INITIALISATION~n',[]), | |
310 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
311 | compute_wd(Body,Hyps5,Opt2,PO) | |
312 | ; b_get_machine_operation(OpName,OpResults,OpFormalParameters,Body,_OType,_TopLevel), | |
313 | PO_Name = OpName, | |
314 | debug_format(19,'Checking WD of OPERATION ~w~n',[OpName]), | |
315 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt2), | |
316 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps5,OpFormalParameters,Hyps6), | |
317 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps6,OpResults,Hyps7), | |
318 | compute_wd(Body,Hyps7,Opt2,PO) | |
319 | ) | |
320 | ) | |
321 | ) | |
322 | ) | |
323 | ), | |
324 | inc_counter(PO_Name). | |
325 | ||
326 | ||
327 | % -------------------- | |
328 | ||
329 | :- use_module(probsrc(tools_strings),[ajoin/2,ajoin_with_sep/3]). | |
330 | % get label of current PO from Options | |
331 | get_current_po_label(POLabel,Options) :- | |
332 | findall(Label,get_label(Label,Options),Labels), | |
333 | Labels \= [], | |
334 | ajoin_with_sep(Labels,'/',POLabel). | |
335 | get_label(Label,Options) :- member(po_label(L),Options), | |
336 | (L = [_|_] -> member(Label,L) ; Label=L). | |
337 | ||
338 | % -------------------- | |
339 | ||
340 | :- use_module(well_def_prover,[prove_po/3]). | |
341 | :- use_module(probsrc(tools_lists),[ord_member_nonvar_chk/2]). | |
342 | ||
343 | create_po(H,Target,Infos,Options,PO) :- create_po(H,Target,Infos,Options,PO,_). | |
344 | ||
345 | create_po(H,Target,Infos,Options,PO,D) :- (var(H) ; H \= hyp_rec(_,_) ; var(Options)),!, | |
346 | add_internal_error('Illegal hypotheses or options: ', create_po(H,Target,Infos,Options,PO,D)),fail. | |
347 | create_po(Hyps,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) :- | |
348 | get_normalized_and_renamed_predicate(Target,Hyps,RenTarget,NT), | |
349 | (get_current_po_label(POLabel,Options) -> true ; POLabel = ''), | |
350 | (ord_member(print_goal,Options) -> translate:print_bexpr(RenTarget),nl ; true), | |
351 | (ord_member(discharge_po,Options) | |
352 | -> (%nl,add_message(well_def_analyser,'Proving ',Target,Infos), | |
353 | prove_proof_obligation(POLabel,Target,NT,Hyps,ProofTree) | |
354 | -> debug_format(19,'PO ~w discharged: ~w~n',[POLabel,ProofTree]), %debug:nl_time, | |
355 | inc_counter(discharged_po), | |
356 | Discharged=true | |
357 | ; inc_counter(not_discharged_po), | |
358 | Discharged=false, | |
359 | (ord_member_nonvar_chk(create_not_discharged_msg(MsgType),Options) | |
360 | -> (prove_po(negation(NT),Hyps,_NegProofTree) | |
361 | -> NegProfStatus = ' (goal provably false)' | |
362 | % Negation can be proven; i.e., PO cannot be proven unless there is a contradiction in Hyps | |
363 | ; NegProfStatus = '' | |
364 | ), | |
365 | (POLabel = '' -> ajoin(['WD-PO not discharged', NegProfStatus, ': '],Msg) | |
366 | ; ajoin(['WD-PO [',POLabel,'] not discharged', NegProfStatus, ': '],Msg) | |
367 | ), | |
368 | ( MsgType=message -> add_message(well_def_analyser,Msg,Target,Infos) | |
369 | ; MsgType=warning -> add_warning(well_def_analyser,Msg,Target,Infos) | |
370 | ; MsgType=silent -> formatsilent('~w~w~n',[Msg,Target]) | |
371 | ; add_error(well_def_analyser,Msg,Target,Infos) | |
372 | ), | |
373 | debug_format(19,' Normalized Proof Target: ~w~n',[NT]) | |
374 | %,(debug_level_active_for(5) -> portray_hyps(Hyps) ; true) % hyps can be shown with create_full_po | |
375 | ; true | |
376 | ) | |
377 | ) | |
378 | ; Discharged=false % no discharging of POs | |
379 | ), | |
380 | extract_pos_infos(Infos,PosInfos), | |
381 | (ord_member(create_full_po,Options) | |
382 | -> Hyps = hyp_rec(AvlNH,_), | |
383 | avl_range(AvlNH,Hyp), | |
384 | (Discharged=true, ord_member(minimize_full_po,Options) | |
385 | -> minimize_hyps(Hyp,RenTarget,Options,NecHyps) % only show minimum core of hyps necessary for proving | |
386 | ; NecHyps=Hyp | |
387 | ), | |
388 | %length(NecHyps,Len), print(hyps(Len)),nl, | |
389 | conjunct_predicates(NecHyps,HypC), | |
390 | safe_create_texpr(implication(HypC,RenTarget),pred,[discharged(Discharged,POLabel)|PosInfos],PO), | |
391 | %nl,translate:print_bexpr(PO),nl, prove_po_with_atelierb(POLabel,[ml],PO,_), | |
392 | % terms:term_hash(PO,Hash), print(Hash),nl, | |
393 | %(ord_member(check_ast,Options) -> bsyntaxtree:check_ast(PO) ; true), | |
394 | (ord_member(prove_with_z3,Options) | |
395 | -> prove_po_with_smt(POLabel,z3,PO,Res),double_check(Discharged,z3,Res) ; true), | |
396 | (ord_member(prove_with_ml,Options) -> prove_po_with_atelierb(POLabel,[ml],PO,_) ; true), | |
397 | (ord_member(prove_with_pp,Options) -> prove_po_with_atelierb(POLabel,[pp],PO,_) ; true) | |
398 | ; RenTarget = b(POE,POT,POI), | |
399 | append([discharged(Discharged,POLabel)|PosInfos],POI,POInfos), | |
400 | PO = b(POE,POT,POInfos) | |
401 | ). | |
402 | ||
403 | double_check(true,Solver,solution(S)) :- !, | |
404 | add_error(Solver,'Double check of discharged PO failed, counter-example: ',S). | |
405 | double_check(_,_,_). | |
406 | ||
407 | % compute unsat core of hypotheses | |
408 | minimize_hyps(Hyps,Goal,Options,NecHyps) :- minimize_hyps_aux(Hyps,Goal,Options,NecHyps,NecHyps),nl. | |
409 | ||
410 | % TO DO: maybe do binary search / divide and conquer | |
411 | % we could also examine which hypotheses were retrieved during the proof | |
412 | % (but not easy; what if access inside a Prolog negation) | |
413 | minimize_hyps_aux([],_,_,_,[]). | |
414 | minimize_hyps_aux([H|T],Goal,Opts,NecessaryHyps,Tail) :- | |
415 | (ord_member(push_more_hyps,Opts) -> ProofOpts = [push_more_hyps] ; ProofOpts=[]), | |
416 | \+ (Tail=T,prove_sequent_cur_context(Goal,NecessaryHyps,ProofOpts)), % we need H to prove Goal | |
417 | !, | |
418 | write('+'), | |
419 | Tail = [H|TT], | |
420 | minimize_hyps_aux(T,Goal,Opts,NecessaryHyps,TT). | |
421 | minimize_hyps_aux([_|T],Goal,Opts,NecessaryHyps,Tail) :- | |
422 | write('-'), | |
423 | minimize_hyps_aux(T,Goal,Opts,NecessaryHyps,Tail). | |
424 | ||
425 | :- use_module(probsrc(runtime_profiler),[register_profiler_runtime/5]). | |
426 | :- use_module(extrasrc(atelierb_provers_interface),[prove_sequent_with_provers/3]). | |
427 | prove_po_with_atelierb(POLabel,Provers,PO,ProofRes) :- runtime_profiler:print_runtime_profile, | |
428 | format('Proving PO ~w with ~w~n',[POLabel,Provers]), | |
429 | statistics(walltime,[T1,_]), | |
430 | catch( | |
431 | prove_sequent_with_provers(Provers,PO,ProofRes), % we cannot use time_out as PP/ML/KRT are a separate process | |
432 | user_interrupt_signal, | |
433 | ProofRes = user_interrupt_signal), | |
434 | statistics(walltime,[T2,_]), WT is T2-T1, | |
435 | !, | |
436 | register_profiler_runtime(atelierb(ProofRes),well_def_analyser,POLabel,WT,WT), | |
437 | format('Result of ~w on PO = ~w (walltime ~w ms)~n',[Provers,ProofRes,WT]), | |
438 | (ProofRes=user_interrupt_signal | |
439 | -> write(' Continue? [y/n] => '), flush_output, read(Cont), | |
440 | (Cont='y' -> true ; Cont='yes' -> true ; throw(user_interrupt_signal)) | |
441 | ; true). | |
442 | ||
443 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree),[create_negation/2]). | |
444 | :- use_module(smt_solvers_interface(smt_solvers_interface),[smt_solve_predicate/4]). | |
445 | prove_po_with_smt(POLabel,Solver,PO,ProofRes) :- runtime_profiler:print_runtime_profile, | |
446 | format('Proving PO ~w with ~w~n',[POLabel,Solver]), | |
447 | %translate:print_bexpr(PO),nl, | |
448 | statistics(walltime,[T1,_]), | |
449 | create_negation(PO,NegPO), | |
450 | smt_solve_predicate(Solver,NegPO,_State,ProofRes),!, | |
451 | statistics(walltime,[T2,_]), WT is T2-T1, | |
452 | register_profiler_runtime(smt(Solver,ProofRes),well_def_analyser,POLabel,WT,WT), | |
453 | format('Result of ~w on PO = ~w (walltime ~w ms)~n',[Solver,ProofRes,WT]). | |
454 | ||
455 | % a wrapper to prove_po which also checks for obvious POs using type info: | |
456 | prove_proof_obligation(POLabel,Target,_NT,Hyps,ProofTree) :- | |
457 | obvious_po(Target,Hyps),!, | |
458 | debug_format(19,'Obvious PO (due to typing info): ~w~n',[POLabel]), | |
459 | register_profiler_runtime(wd_prob_prover(obvious_po),well_def_analyser,POLabel,0,0), | |
460 | ProofTree = obvious_po. | |
461 | prove_proof_obligation(POLabel,_Target,NT,Hyps,ProofTree) :- | |
462 | statistics(runtime,[RT1,_]), | |
463 | statistics(walltime,[T1,_]), | |
464 | (prove_po(NT,Hyps,ProofTree) -> Res=discharged | |
465 | ; Res=unknown,ProofTree='' % ,format('~n *********** WD PO UNKNOWN ~w~n~n',[POLabel]) | |
466 | ), | |
467 | statistics(runtime,[RT2,_]), RT is RT2-RT1, | |
468 | statistics(walltime,[T2,_]), WT is T2-T1, | |
469 | register_profiler_runtime(wd_prob_prover(Res),well_def_analyser,POLabel,RT,WT), | |
470 | (WT>10 -> format('Proof of \'~w\' took ~w ms, result=~w (~w)~n',[POLabel,WT,Res,ProofTree]) | |
471 | %, translate:print_bexpr(_Target),nl, assertz(well_def_prover:dt),(prove_po(NT,Hyps,_) -> true ; true), trace | |
472 | ; true), | |
473 | Res=discharged. | |
474 | ||
475 | %:- use_module(well_def_hyps,[is_finite_type_for_wd/2]). | |
476 | obvious_po(b(finite(Set),pred,_),Hyps) :- | |
477 | get_texpr_type(Set,Type), % check this proof rule here, as prove_po has no longer types in the AST | |
478 | is_finite_type_for_wd(Type,Hyps). | |
479 | ||
480 | % ------------------------------ | |
481 | ||
482 | :- dynamic counter/2. | |
483 | reset_stats :- retractall(counter(_,_)), | |
484 | assertz(counter(discharged_po,0)), | |
485 | assertz(counter(not_discharged_po,0)). | |
486 | ||
487 | inc_counter(C) :- (retract(counter(C,Nr)) -> N1 is Nr+1 ; N1 = 1), | |
488 | assertz(counter(C,N1)). | |
489 | ||
490 | print_stats :- silent_mode(on),!. | |
491 | print_stats :- findall(C/N,counter(C,N),L), format('WD Stats: ~w~n',[L]). | |
492 | ||
493 | %tcltk_get_stats(list([list(['Category','Nr'])|Stats])) :- | |
494 | % findall(list([C,N]),counter(C,N),Stats). | |
495 | ||
496 | get_discharged_result(ResStr,D,Tot,AllDischarged) :- counter(not_discharged_po,ND), | |
497 | counter(discharged_po,D), Tot is ND+D, | |
498 | ajoin([D,'/',Tot,' DISCHARGED'],ResStr), | |
499 | (ND=0 -> AllDischarged='TRUE' ; AllDischarged='FALSE'). | |
500 | ||
501 | % ------------------------------ | |
502 | ||
503 | annotate_wd(TExpr,AnnotatedTExpr) :- | |
504 | reset_stats, | |
505 | %empty_hyps(EH), | |
506 | push_properties_invariant_hyps([],EH), | |
507 | Options = [discharge_po], | |
508 | transform_wd(TExpr,EH,Options,AnnotatedTExpr), | |
509 | print_bexpr_with_wd_info(AnnotatedTExpr). | |
510 | ||
511 | ||
512 | :- use_module(probsrc(preferences),[temporary_set_preference/3, reset_temporary_preference/2, get_preference/2]). | |
513 | print_bexpr_with_wd_info(TExpr) :- | |
514 | temporary_set_preference(pp_wd_infos,true,Chng), | |
515 | call_cleanup(translate:nested_print_bexpr(TExpr),reset_temporary_preference(pp_wd_infos,Chng)), | |
516 | nl. | |
517 | ||
518 | % transform an AST by adding annotations about discharged POs | |
519 | transform_wd(b(Expr,Type,Info),Hypotheses,Options,b(NewExpr,Type,NewInfo)) :- | |
520 | memberchk(contains_wd_condition,Info), | |
521 | !, | |
522 | syntaxtransformation(Expr,Subs,TNames,NSubs,NewExpr), | |
523 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,TNames,Hyps2), | |
524 | (wd_transparent(Expr) | |
525 | -> l_transform_wd(Subs,Hyps2,Options,NSubs), adapt_info(Info,NSubs,NewInfo) | |
526 | ; wd_like_conjunction(Expr,Ids,A,B) | |
527 | -> l_transform_conj_wd([A,B],Hyps2,Options,[TA,TB]), | |
528 | check_top_level_wd(conj,Expr,Type,Info,Hyps2,Options, [TA,TB], NewInfo), | |
529 | wd_like_conjunction(NewExpr,Ids,TA,TB) | |
530 | ; transform_special_expr(Expr,Type,Info,Hyps2,Options,NewExpr,NewInfo) -> true | |
531 | ; l_transform_wd(Subs,Hyps2,Options,NSubs) | |
532 | -> | |
533 | check_top_level_wd(other,Expr,Type,Info,Hyps2,Options, NSubs, NewInfo) | |
534 | ). | |
535 | transform_wd(TExpr,_,_,TExpr). % copy entire expression if no contains_wd_condition info | |
536 | ||
537 | check_top_level_wd(conj,Expr,Type,Info,Hyps,Options, _NSubs, NewInfo) :- | |
538 | Discharged=false, | |
539 | create_top_level_wd_po_conj_like(Expr,Type,Info,Hyps,Options,_PO,Discharged),!, % PO not proven; keep Info as is | |
540 | %write(-), flush_output, %print(not_discharged(PO)),nl, | |
541 | NewInfo=Info. | |
542 | check_top_level_wd(other,Expr,Type,Info,Hyps,Options, _NSubs, NewInfo) :- | |
543 | Discharged=false, | |
544 | create_top_level_wd_po(Expr,Type,Info,Hyps,Options,_PO,Discharged), | |
545 | !, % PO not proven; keep Info as is | |
546 | %write(-), flush_output, print(not_discharged(_PO)),nl, | |
547 | NewInfo=Info. | |
548 | check_top_level_wd(_,_Expr,_Type,Info,_Hyps,_Options, NSubs, NewInfo) :- % no top-level PO or PO proven | |
549 | adapt_info(Info,NSubs,NewInfo). | |
550 | ||
551 | %:- use_module(library(lists),[delete/3]). | |
552 | % adapt WD Info depending on result of analysis | |
553 | adapt_info(Info,Subs,NewInfo) :- subs_contain_wd_condition(Subs),!,NewInfo=Info. | |
554 | adapt_info(Info,_,[discharged_wd_po|NewInfo]) :- | |
555 | NewInfo=Info, memberchk(contains_wd_condition,Info). | |
556 | %delete(Info,contains_wd_condition,NewInfo). | |
557 | ||
558 | subs_contain_wd_condition(Subs) :- | |
559 | member(b(_,_,Infos),Subs), | |
560 | (memberchk(contains_wd_condition,Infos) -> nonmember(discharged_wd_po,Infos)). | |
561 | ||
562 | % transform independent sub-arguments | |
563 | l_transform_wd([],_Hyps,_Options,[]). | |
564 | l_transform_wd([Sub|T],Hyps,Options,[NSub|NT]) :- | |
565 | transform_wd(Sub,Hyps,Options,NSub), | |
566 | l_transform_wd(T,Hyps,Options,NT). | |
567 | ||
568 | % transform conjunction like sub-arguments, with left-to-right adding of hypotheses | |
569 | l_transform_conj_wd([],_Hyps,_Options,[]). | |
570 | l_transform_conj_wd([Sub|T],Hyps,Options,[NSub|NT]) :- | |
571 | transform_wd(Sub,Hyps,Options,NSub), | |
572 | push_hyp(Hyps,Sub,Options,Hyps2), | |
573 | l_transform_conj_wd(T,Hyps2,Options,NT). | |
574 | ||
575 | % transform special cases where sub-arguments are not independent nor conjunction-like | |
576 | % TO DO: assign | |
577 | transform_special_expr(disjunct(A,B),_,Info,Hyps,Options,disjunct(TA,TB),NewInfo) :- | |
578 | transform_wd(A,Hyps,Options,TA), | |
579 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
580 | push_hyp(Hyps,NA,Options,Hyps2), | |
581 | transform_wd(B,Hyps2,Options,TB), | |
582 | adapt_info(Info,[TA,TB],NewInfo). | |
583 | transform_special_expr(if_then_else(A,B,C),_,Info,Hyps,Options,if_then_else(TA,TB,TC),NewInfo) :- | |
584 | transform_wd(A,Hyps,Options,TA), | |
585 | push_hyp(Hyps,A,Options,Hyps2), | |
586 | transform_wd(B,Hyps2,Options,TB), | |
587 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
588 | push_hyp(Hyps,NA,Options,Hyps3), | |
589 | transform_wd(C,Hyps3,Options,TC), | |
590 | adapt_info(Info,[TA,TB,TC],NewInfo). | |
591 | transform_special_expr(recursive_let(ID,B),_,Info,Hyps,Options,recursive_let(ID,TB),NewInfo) :- NewInfo=Info, | |
592 | transform_wd(B,Hyps,Options,TB). | |
593 | transform_special_expr(general_sum(Ids,P,E),_Type,Info,Hyps,Options,general_sum(Ids,TP,TE),NewInfo) :- | |
594 | NewInfo=Info, % Note: we do not try to discharge finite PO; TODO: add | |
595 | transform_wd(P,Hyps,Options,TP), | |
596 | push_hyp(Hyps,P,Options,Hyps2), | |
597 | transform_wd(E,Hyps2,Options,TE). | |
598 | transform_special_expr(general_product(Ids,P,E),_Type,Info,Hyps,Options,general_product(Ids,TP,TE),NewInfo) :- | |
599 | NewInfo=Info, % Note: we do not try to discharge finite PO | |
600 | transform_wd(P,Hyps,Options,TP), | |
601 | push_hyp(Hyps,P,Options,Hyps2), | |
602 | transform_wd(E,Hyps2,Options,TE). | |
603 | transform_special_expr(if(List),_,Info,Hyps,Options,if(TList),NewInfo) :- | |
604 | list_transform_if_elsif_wd(List,Hyps,Options,TList), | |
605 | adapt_info(Info,TList,NewInfo). | |
606 | ||
607 | list_transform_if_elsif_wd([],_,_,[]). | |
608 | list_transform_if_elsif_wd([b(if_elsif(A,Body),Type,I) | T], Hyps,Options,Res) :- | |
609 | is_truth(A),!, | |
610 | Res=[b(if_elsif(A,TBody),Type,I) | T], | |
611 | transform_wd(Body,Hyps,Options,TBody). | |
612 | list_transform_if_elsif_wd([b(if_elsif(A,Body),Type,I) | T], Hyps,Options, | |
613 | [b(if_elsif(TA,TBody),Type,I) | TT]) :- | |
614 | transform_wd(A,Hyps,Options,TA), | |
615 | push_hyp(Hyps,A,Options,Hyps2), | |
616 | transform_wd(Body,Hyps2,Options,TBody), | |
617 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
618 | push_hyp(Hyps,NA,Options,Hyps3), | |
619 | list_transform_if_elsif_wd(T,Hyps3,Options,TT). | |
620 | ||
621 | % ------------------------------ | |
622 | ||
623 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree),[conjunction_to_list/2]). | |
624 | :- use_module(probsrc(tools),[split_list/4]). | |
625 | ||
626 | % process those conjuncts with no WD condition first; this means we have more hypotheses for proving and is safe for ProB | |
627 | % Option 'skip_finite_po' can be used to not generate finite(.) POs. | |
628 | % These POs are, e.g., irrelevant for constraint solving in ProB since the solver would exceed the timeout if finite(.) cannot be proven. | |
629 | compute_wd_with_reordering(TExpr,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- \+ ord_member(reorder_conjuncts,Options),!, | |
630 | compute_wd(TExpr,Hypotheses,Options,PO). | |
631 | compute_wd_with_reordering(TExpr,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
632 | conjunction_to_list(TExpr,Conjuncts), | |
633 | split_list(is_well_defined_conjunct,Conjuncts,Conj1,Conj2), | |
634 | Conj2 \= [], % otherwise no WD condition anyway | |
635 | (ord_member(ignore_wd_infos,Options) | |
636 | -> append(Conj1,Conj2,Conj12), | |
637 | list_compute_wd(Conj12,Options,Hypotheses,PO) | |
638 | ; push_hyps(Hypotheses,Conj1,Options,Hyps2), % push the Hypotheses without WD checking | |
639 | list_compute_wd(Conj2,Options,Hyps2,PO) | |
640 | ). | |
641 | ||
642 | %is_well_defined_conjunct(TE) :- print('Checking conjunct: '), translate:print_bexpr(TE),nl,fail. | |
643 | is_well_defined_conjunct(b(_,_,Infos)) :- nonmember(contains_wd_condition,Infos),!. | |
644 | %is_well_defined_conjunct(TE) :- print('Not well defined: '), translate:print_bexpr(TE),nl,fail. | |
645 | ||
646 | compute_wd(TExpr,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
647 | syntaxtraversion(TExpr,Expr,Type,Infos,Subs,TNames), | |
648 | (ord_member(ignore_wd_infos,Options) -> true ; memberchk(contains_wd_condition,Infos) -> true), | |
649 | %(print(Expr),nl ; print(backtrack(Expr)),nl,fail), | |
650 | (get_info_labels(Infos,Label) -> ord_add_element(Options,po_label(Label),Opt2) ; Opt2=Options), | |
651 | compute_wd_aux(Expr,Type,Infos,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Opt2,PO), | |
652 | true. %check_if_po_expected(PO,TExpr,Infos). | |
653 | ||
654 | check_if_po_expected(PO,TExpr,Infos) :- | |
655 | ( memberchk(contains_wd_condition,Infos) -> true | |
656 | ; get_texpr_info(PO,POInfo), POInfo=[discharged(true,_)|_] -> true | |
657 | % Note: Sigma currently gets no contains_wd_condition, but has finiteness WD constraint | |
658 | ; add_error(well_def_analyser,'Unexpected WD-PO for expression marked to have no WD condition:',PO,TExpr) | |
659 | ). | |
660 | ||
661 | :- use_module(library(lists),[maplist/3]). | |
662 | % treat assignment substitution | |
663 | % see b_assign_values_or_functions in b_interpreter | |
664 | compute_wd_assign(Hyps,Options,PO,LHS,RHS) :- LHS=b(function(F,X),_,_), | |
665 | !, | |
666 | % special case for f(X) := RHS | |
667 | ( compute_wd(F,Hyps,Options,PO) % ? | |
668 | ; compute_wd(X,Hyps,Options,PO) | |
669 | ; compute_wd(RHS,Hyps,Options,PO) ). | |
670 | compute_wd_assign(Hyps,Options,PO,_,RHS) :- % LHS must be an identifier | |
671 | compute_wd(RHS,Hyps,Options,PO). | |
672 | ||
673 | compute_wd_aux(assign(LHSList,RHSList),_,_,_,[],Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
674 | !, | |
675 | maplist(compute_wd_assign(Hypotheses,Options,PO),LHSList,RHSList). | |
676 | compute_wd_aux(Expr,_,_,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
677 | wd_transparent(Expr),!, | |
678 | % cut: only look at WD condition of all sub-arguments | |
679 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,TNames,Hyps2), | |
680 | member(Sub,Subs), | |
681 | compute_wd(Sub,Hyps2,Options,PO). | |
682 | % Now the rules which do not look at all sub-arguments with original Hypotheses: | |
683 | compute_wd_aux(conjunct(A,B),_,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
684 | flatten_conjunct(A,B,List), % avoid re-pushing hyps if A is nested conjunct | |
685 | compute_wd_conjuncts(List,Hypotheses,Options,PO). | |
686 | compute_wd_aux(sequence(List),subst,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- % sequential composition | |
687 | !, | |
688 | sequence_compute_wd(List,Options,Hypotheses,PO). | |
689 | compute_wd_aux(while(COND,STMT,INV,VARIANT),_,Infos,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
690 | (member(modifies(VarsModified),Infos) -> debug_println(9,computed_wd_while(VarsModified)) | |
691 | ; add_error(well_def_analyser,'While does not contain modifies info:',Infos,Infos), | |
692 | VarsModified=[] | |
693 | ), | |
694 | copy_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,VarsModified,Hyps2), % we can no longer make any assumption about the modified vars | |
695 | % this corresponds to a universal quantification | |
696 | ( compute_wd(INV,Hyps2,Options,PO) % Invariant must hold before and after WHILE loop | |
697 | ; | |
698 | push_hyp(Hyps2,INV,Options,Hyps3), % add INV to the hypotheses now for the other parts of the WHILE | |
699 | ( | |
700 | compute_wd(COND,Hyps3,Options,PO) | |
701 | ; | |
702 | compute_wd(VARIANT,Hyps3,Options,PO) % NAT proof rule for While must also hold if P is false according to Atelier-B handbook (otherwise we could have pushed COND onto the stack) | |
703 | ; | |
704 | push_hyp(Hyps3,COND,Options,Hyps4), | |
705 | compute_wd(STMT,Hyps4,Options,PO) % Statement is only executed if COND is true; INV is checked | |
706 | ) | |
707 | ). | |
708 | compute_wd_aux(Expr,Type,Infos,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
709 | wd_like_conjunction(Expr,_,A,B),!, | |
710 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,TNames,Hyps2), | |
711 | ( create_top_level_wd_po_conj_like(Expr,Type,Infos,Hyps2,Options,PO,_Discharged) % e.g., for assertion_expression | |
712 | ; | |
713 | compute_wd_aux(conjunct(A,B),Type,Infos,Subs,TNames,Hyps2,Options,PO) | |
714 | ). | |
715 | compute_wd_aux(if_then_else(A,B,C),_,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
716 | (compute_wd(A,Hypotheses,Options,PO) | |
717 | ; | |
718 | push_hyp(Hypotheses,A,Options,NewHyp), | |
719 | compute_wd(B,NewHyp,Options,PO) | |
720 | ; | |
721 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
722 | push_hyp(Hypotheses,NA,Options,NewHyp), | |
723 | compute_wd(C,NewHyp,Options,PO)). | |
724 | compute_wd_aux(if(List),_,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
725 | list_compute_if_elsif_wd(List,Hypotheses,Options,PO). | |
726 | compute_wd_aux(disjunct(A,B),_,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
727 | (compute_wd(A,Hypotheses,Options,PO) | |
728 | ; | |
729 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
730 | push_hyp(Hypotheses,NA,Options,NewHyp), | |
731 | compute_wd(B,NewHyp,Options,PO)). | |
732 | compute_wd_aux(general_sum(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, % SIGMA, real or integer | |
733 | ( % first the sub arguments | |
734 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,Ids,Hyps2), | |
735 | ( compute_wd(P,Hyps2,Options,PO) | |
736 | ; | |
737 | push_hyp(Hyps2,P,Options,NewHyp), | |
738 | compute_wd(E,NewHyp,Options,PO) | |
739 | ) | |
740 | ; % now the PO of general_sum itself | |
741 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_sum(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,_Discharged) | |
742 | ). | |
743 | compute_wd_aux(general_product(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, % PI | |
744 | compute_wd_aux(general_sum(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO). | |
745 | compute_wd_aux(rlevent(_Name,_Sect,_Status,_Params,Guard,Theorems,Actions,VWit,PWit,_Unmod,_AbstractEvents), | |
746 | _,_Infos,_Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
747 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,TNames,Hyps2), | |
748 | % TO DO: treat nested lists VWit,... | |
749 | Act = b(parallel(Actions),subst,[]), | |
750 | append([[Guard],Theorems,VWit,PWit,[Act]],List), | |
751 | list_compute_wd(List,Options,Hyps2,PO). | |
752 | compute_wd_aux(recursive_let(_ID,Body),_,_,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- !, | |
753 | % the ID does not have to be added to hypothesis stack ! | |
754 | compute_wd(Body,Hypotheses,Options,PO). | |
755 | % ---------------- | |
756 | % Now the rules where we also look at the sub-arguments with original Hypotheses: | |
757 | compute_wd_aux(_,_,_,Subs,TNames,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
758 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hypotheses,TNames,Hyp2), | |
759 | % look at WD condition of all sub-arguments independently | |
760 | member(Sub,Subs), | |
761 | compute_wd(Sub,Hyp2,Options,PO). | |
762 | % Now the specific rules: | |
763 | compute_wd_aux(Expr,Type,Infos,_,_,Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
764 | create_top_level_wd_po(Expr,Type,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,_Discharged). | |
765 | ||
766 | % treat a list of conjuncts (after flattening) | |
767 | %compute_wd_conjuncts([],_,_,_) :- fail. | |
768 | compute_wd_conjuncts([A|T],Hypotheses,Options,PO) :- | |
769 | (compute_wd(A,Hypotheses,Options,PO) | |
770 | ; | |
771 | T \= [], | |
772 | push_hyp(Hypotheses,A,Options,NewHyp), | |
773 | compute_wd_conjuncts(T,NewHyp,Options,PO)). | |
774 | ||
775 | % flatten conjuncts to avoid re-pushing the same hypotheses | |
776 | flatten_conjunct(ConjA,ConjB,List) :- | |
777 | flatten_conjunct_dl(ConjA,List,[ConjB]). % Tail not flattened; not necessary for performance | |
778 | flatten_conjunct_dl(b(conjunct(A,B),_,_)) --> !, flatten_conjunct_dl(A), flatten_conjunct_dl(B). | |
779 | flatten_conjunct_dl(X) --> [X]. | |
780 | ||
781 | ||
782 | % create top-level WD conditions for conjunction-like operators; not for sub-arguments | |
783 | create_top_level_wd_po_conj_like(assertion_expression(A,_Msg,_),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
784 | Target = A, | |
785 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label('ASSERT'),Options2), | |
786 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options2,PO,Discharged). | |
787 | ||
788 | % create top-level WD conditions; not for sub-arguments | |
789 | create_top_level_wd_po(function(A,B),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
790 | (get_texpr_type(B,TB), | |
791 | safe_create_texpr(domain(A),set(TB),[],DomA), | |
792 | safe_create_texpr(member(B,DomA),pred,[],Target), | |
793 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
794 | %, tools_printing:print_term_summary(created_function_po(Target,PO)) | |
795 | ; | |
796 | create_partial_fun_target(A,Target), | |
797 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
798 | ). | |
799 | create_top_level_wd_po(div(_,B),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
800 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
801 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(B,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
802 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
803 | create_top_level_wd_po(div_real(_,B),real,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
804 | create_texpr(real('0.0'),real,[],Zero), | |
805 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(B,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
806 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
807 | create_top_level_wd_po(floored_div(_,B),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
808 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
809 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(B,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
810 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
811 | create_top_level_wd_po(modulo(A,B),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
812 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
813 | ( safe_create_texpr(greater(B,Zero),pred,[],Target), % does TLA require this to be positive?? | |
814 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
815 | ; \+ z_or_tla_minor_mode, | |
816 | safe_create_texpr(greater_equal(A,Zero),pred,[],Target), % in B A must be positive | |
817 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
818 | ). | |
819 | create_top_level_wd_po(power_of(A,B),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
820 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
821 | ( AB=B, % B >= 0 must hold in B and Event-B | |
822 | safe_create_texpr(greater_equal(AB,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
823 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
824 | ; eventb_mode, % TO DO: what happens in Z and TLA+? | |
825 | AB=A, % A >= 0 must hold in Event-B | |
826 | safe_create_texpr(greater_equal(AB,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
827 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
828 | ). | |
829 | create_top_level_wd_po(power_of_real(A,B),real,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
830 | % power_of_real has a WD condition, real ** integer has not | |
831 | create_texpr(real('0.0'),real,[],Zero), | |
832 | ( % A < 0 => real(floor(B))=B | |
833 | safe_create_texpr(less_real(A,Zero),pred,[],LHS), | |
834 | safe_create_texpr(convert_int_floor(B),integer,[],FloorB), | |
835 | safe_create_texpr(convert_real(FloorB),real,[],BB), | |
836 | safe_create_texpr(equal(B,BB),pred,[],RHS), | |
837 | safe_create_texpr(implication(LHS,RHS),pred,[],Target), | |
838 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
839 | ; % A = 0 => B >= 0 | |
840 | safe_create_texpr(equal(A,Zero),pred,[],LHS), | |
841 | safe_create_texpr(less_equal_real(Zero,B),pred,[],RHS), | |
842 | safe_create_texpr(implication(LHS,RHS),pred,[],Target), | |
843 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged) | |
844 | ). | |
845 | create_top_level_wd_po(iteration(_Rel,Index),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
846 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
847 | safe_create_texpr(greater_equal(Index,Zero),pred,[],Target), | |
848 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
849 | create_top_level_wd_po(card(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- | |
850 | !, | |
851 | \+ skip_finite_pos(Options), | |
852 | safe_create_texpr(finite(S),pred,[contains_wd_condition],Target), | |
853 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
854 | create_top_level_wd_po(max(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
855 | get_texpr_type(S,TS), | |
856 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(S,b(empty_set,TS,[])),pred,[],Target1), | |
857 | ( skip_finite_pos(Options) | |
858 | -> Target = Target1 | |
859 | ; safe_create_texpr(finite(S),pred,[contains_wd_condition],Target2), | |
860 | conjunct_predicates([Target1,Target2],Target) % this is a sufficient condition, not a necessary one | |
861 | ), | |
862 | % create a single PO, because of use in check_top_level_wd | |
863 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
864 | create_top_level_wd_po(min(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
865 | get_texpr_type(S,TS), | |
866 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(S,b(empty_set,TS,[])),pred,[],Target1), | |
867 | ( skip_finite_pos(Options) | |
868 | -> Target = Target1 | |
869 | ; safe_create_texpr(finite(S),pred,[contains_wd_condition],Target2), | |
870 | conjunct_predicates([Target1,Target2],Target) % this is a sufficient condition, not a necessary one | |
871 | ), | |
872 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
873 | create_top_level_wd_po(max_real(S),real,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
874 | create_top_level_wd_po(max(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged). % create same PO as for integer max | |
875 | create_top_level_wd_po(min_real(S),real,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
876 | create_top_level_wd_po(min(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged). % ditto | |
877 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_intersection(A),TA,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, % inter | |
878 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(A,b(empty_set,set(TA),[])),pred,[],Target), | |
879 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
880 | % Sequence operators: | |
881 | create_top_level_wd_po(size(S),integer,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
882 | % we do not have to create a finite PO: sequences are by construction finite | |
883 | create_sequence_target(S,Target), | |
884 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
885 | create_top_level_wd_po(insert_tail(S,_),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
886 | create_sequence_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
887 | create_top_level_wd_po(insert_front(_,S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
888 | % page 174 of Abrial's book just requires that S is a partial function NATURAL1 +-> TYPE | |
889 | create_sequence_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
890 | create_top_level_wd_po(rev(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
891 | create_sequence_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
892 | create_top_level_wd_po(concat(S1,S2),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
893 | (create_sequence_target(S1,Target) ; create_sequence_target(S2,Target)), | |
894 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
895 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_concat(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
896 | create_seq_seq_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
897 | create_top_level_wd_po(first(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
898 | create_sequence1_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
899 | create_top_level_wd_po(last(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
900 | create_sequence1_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
901 | create_top_level_wd_po(front(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
902 | create_sequence1_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
903 | create_top_level_wd_po(tail(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
904 | create_sequence1_target(S,Target), create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
905 | create_top_level_wd_po(restrict_front(S,N),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
906 | ( create_sequence_target(S,Target) ; create_seq_interval_target(S,N,Target) ), | |
907 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
908 | create_top_level_wd_po(restrict_tail(S,N),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
909 | ( create_sequence_target(S,Target) ; create_seq_interval_target(S,N,Target) ), | |
910 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
911 | create_top_level_wd_po(mu(S),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, % Z MU Operator | |
912 | get_texpr_type(S,TS), | |
913 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(S,b(empty_set,TS,[])),pred,[],Target1), | |
914 | create_texpr(integer(1),integer,[],One), | |
915 | safe_create_texpr(card(S),integer,[contains_wd_condition],CardS), | |
916 | safe_create_texpr(less_equal(CardS,One),pred,[],Target2), | |
917 | ( skip_finite_pos(Options) | |
918 | -> conjunct_predicates([Target1,Target2],Target) | |
919 | ; safe_create_texpr(finite(S),pred,[contains_wd_condition],Target3), | |
920 | conjunct_predicates([Target1,Target3,Target2],Target) | |
921 | ), | |
922 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
923 | % External Functions: | |
924 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_function_call('MU',[S]),T,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
925 | create_top_level_wd_po(mu(S),T,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
926 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_function_call('CHOOSE',[A]),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
927 | get_texpr_type(A,TA), | |
928 | safe_create_texpr(not_equal(A,b(empty_set,set(TA),[])),pred,[],Target), | |
929 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
930 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_function_call('SQUASH',[A]),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
931 | create_partial_fun_target(A,Target), | |
932 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
933 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_function_call(C,_),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
934 | % external_fun_has_wd_condition is true | |
935 | get_preference(wd_ignore_external_funs,false), | |
936 | create_po(Hypotheses,b(unknown_truth_value(C),pred,[]),Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
937 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_subst_call(C,_),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, % ditto | |
938 | get_preference(wd_ignore_external_funs,false), | |
939 | create_po(Hypotheses,b(unknown_truth_value(C),pred,[]),Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
940 | create_top_level_wd_po(external_pred_call(C,_),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, % ditto | |
941 | get_preference(wd_ignore_external_funs,false), | |
942 | create_po(Hypotheses,b(unknown_truth_value(C),pred,[]),Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
943 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_product(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
944 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_sum(Ids,P,E),Type,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
945 | create_top_level_wd_po(general_sum(Ids,P,_E),_,Infos,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- !, | |
946 | \+ skip_finite_pos(Options), | |
947 | create_comprehension_set(Ids,P,[],TS), | |
948 | safe_create_texpr(finite(TS),pred,[contains_wd_condition],Target), | |
949 | create_po(Hypotheses,Target,Infos,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
950 | % Unsupported: | |
951 | create_top_level_wd_po(Expr,T,I,Hypotheses,Options,PO,Discharged) :- | |
952 | functor(Expr,F,N), | |
953 | ajoin(['Unsupported expression ',F,'/',N,': '],Msg), | |
954 | (ord_member_nonvar_chk(create_not_discharged_msg(MsgType),Options) | |
955 | -> (MsgType=silent -> true ; add_message(well_def_analyser,Msg,Expr,I)) % we create warning below | |
956 | ; known_to_be_unsupported(F,N) | |
957 | -> add_warning(well_def_analyser,Msg,Expr,I) | |
958 | ; wd_transparent(Expr) | |
959 | -> add_error(well_def_analyser,Msg,'transparent operator has no top-level WD condition',I) | |
960 | ; (wd_like_conjunction(Expr,_,_,_) ; Expr=disjunct(_,_)) | |
961 | -> add_error(well_def_analyser,Msg,'operator has no top-level WD condition',I) | |
962 | ; add_internal_error(Msg,create_top_level_wd_po(Expr,T,I,_,Options,PO,Discharged)) | |
963 | ), | |
964 | inc_counter(unsupported), | |
965 | create_po(Hypotheses,b(unknown_truth_value(F),pred,[wd(Expr)]),I,Options,PO,Discharged). | |
966 | ||
967 | skip_finite_pos(Options) :- | |
968 | (get_preference(wd_skip_finite_pos,true) -> true | |
969 | ; ord_member(skip_finite_po, Options)). | |
970 | ||
971 | known_to_be_unsupported(freetype_destructor,3). % has WD condition, see check_freetype_case in b_interpreter | |
972 | known_to_be_unsupported(lazy_let_expr,3). | |
973 | known_to_be_unsupported(lazy_let_pred,3). | |
974 | known_to_be_unsupported(lazy_let_subst,3). | |
975 | known_to_be_unsupported(quantified_intersection,3). | |
976 | ||
977 | create_partial_fun_target(A,Target) :- | |
978 | % see create_function_check in bvisual2 | |
979 | get_texpr_type(A,TA), is_set_type(TA,couple(TDom,TRan)), | |
980 | create_type_set(TDom,TDT), % we could also use create_maximal_type_set/2 | |
981 | create_type_set(TRan,TRT), | |
982 | safe_create_texpr(partial_function(TDT,TRT),set(TA),[],PF), | |
983 | safe_create_texpr(member(A,PF),pred,[],Target). | |
984 | ||
985 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree),[is_set_type/2]). | |
986 | % get texpr for set of all sequences: | |
987 | create_seq_type_expr(Seq,Sequences) :- | |
988 | get_texpr_type(Seq,ST), | |
989 | is_set_type(ST,couple(_,TRan)), | |
990 | create_type_set(TRan,TRT), | |
991 | safe_create_texpr(seq(TRT),set(ST),[],Sequences). | |
992 | create_seq1_type_expr(Seq,Sequences) :- | |
993 | get_texpr_type(Seq,ST), | |
994 | is_set_type(ST,couple(_,TRan)), | |
995 | create_type_set(TRan,TRT), | |
996 | safe_create_texpr(seq1(TRT),set(ST),[],Sequences). | |
997 | create_seq_seq_type_expr(SeqSeq,SequencesOfSequences) :- | |
998 | get_texpr_type(SeqSeq,SST), | |
999 | is_set_type(SST,couple(_,SeqT)), % SeqT = type of the inner sequences | |
1000 | is_set_type(SeqT,couple(_,TRan)), % TRan is type elements in the inner sequence | |
1001 | create_type_set(TRan,TRT1), | |
1002 | safe_create_texpr(seq(TRT1),set(SeqT),[],Sequences), | |
1003 | safe_create_texpr(seq(Sequences),set(SST),[],SequencesOfSequences). | |
1004 | ||
1005 | create_type_set(boolean,Res) :- !, Res=b(bool_set,set(boolean),[]). % custom rule not necessary | |
1006 | create_type_set(integer,Res) :- !, Res=b(integer_set('INTEGER'),set(integer),[]). | |
1007 | create_type_set(string,Res) :- !, Res=b(string_set,set(string),[]). | |
1008 | create_type_set(Type,Res) :- create_texpr(typeset,set(Type),[],Res). | |
1009 | ||
1010 | create_sequence_target(S,Target) :- | |
1011 | create_seq_type_expr(S,Sequences), | |
1012 | extract_pos_infos(S,PosInfos), | |
1013 | safe_create_texpr(member(S,Sequences),pred,PosInfos,Target). | |
1014 | create_sequence1_target(S,Target) :- | |
1015 | create_seq1_type_expr(S,Sequences), | |
1016 | extract_pos_infos(S,PosInfos), | |
1017 | safe_create_texpr(member(S,Sequences),pred,PosInfos,Target). | |
1018 | create_seq_seq_target(S,Target) :- | |
1019 | create_seq_seq_type_expr(S,SeqSeq), | |
1020 | extract_pos_infos(S,PosInfos), | |
1021 | safe_create_texpr(member(S,SeqSeq),pred,PosInfos,Target). | |
1022 | ||
1023 | create_seq_interval_target(S,N,Target) :- | |
1024 | create_texpr(integer(0),integer,[],Zero), | |
1025 | safe_create_texpr(size(S),integer,[contains_wd_condition],MaxIdx), | |
1026 | safe_create_texpr(interval(Zero,MaxIdx),set(integer),[],ValidIdxs), | |
1027 | safe_create_texpr(member(N,ValidIdxs),pred,[],Target). | |
1028 | ||
1029 | % compute WD of a conjunction/sequence of formulas | |
1030 | list_compute_wd([A|_],Options,Hyps,PO) :- | |
1031 | compute_wd(A,Hyps,Options,PO). | |
1032 | list_compute_wd([A|T],Options,Hyps,PO) :- T \= [], | |
1033 | push_hyp(Hyps,A,Options,Hyps2), | |
1034 | list_compute_wd(T,Options,Hyps2,PO). | |
1035 | ||
1036 | % compute WD of a list of independent formulas | |
1037 | %list_indep_compute_wd([A|T],Options,Hyps,PO) :- | |
1038 | % (compute_wd(A,Hyps,Options,PO) | |
1039 | % ; | |
1040 | % list_indep_compute_wd(T,Options,Hyps,PO)). | |
1041 | ||
1042 | % compute WD of a list of IF-THEN-ELSE cases: | |
1043 | list_compute_if_elsif_wd([b(if_elsif(A,Body),_,_) | T], Hyps,Options,PO) :- | |
1044 | ( is_truth(A) -> compute_wd(Body,Hyps,Options,PO) | |
1045 | ; ( compute_wd(A,Hyps,Options,PO) | |
1046 | ; | |
1047 | push_hyp(Hyps,A,Options,NewHyp), | |
1048 | compute_wd(Body,NewHyp,Options,PO) | |
1049 | ; | |
1050 | T \= [], | |
1051 | negate_hyp(A,NA), | |
1052 | push_hyp(Hyps,NA,Options,NewHyp), | |
1053 | list_compute_if_elsif_wd(T, NewHyp,Options,PO) | |
1054 | ) | |
1055 | ). | |
1056 | ||
1057 | % compute WD of a conjunction/sequence of formulas | |
1058 | sequence_compute_wd([A|_],Options,Hyps,PO) :- | |
1059 | compute_wd(A,Hyps,Options,PO). | |
1060 | sequence_compute_wd([A|T],Options,Hyps,PO) :- T \= [], | |
1061 | update_hyp_for_sequence_lhs(Hyps,A,Options,Hyps2), | |
1062 | sequence_compute_wd(T,Options,Hyps2,PO). | |
1063 | ||
1064 | :- use_module(probsrc(b_read_write_info), [get_accessed_vars/4]). | |
1065 | % update the hypotheses depending on effect of LHS of a sequential composition: | |
1066 | update_hyp_for_sequence_lhs(Hyps,b(LHS,subst,_),Options,Hyps2) :- | |
1067 | process_seq_lhs_aux(LHS,Hyps,Options,Hyps2), | |
1068 | !. | |
1069 | update_hyp_for_sequence_lhs(Hyps,TStmt,_Options,Hyps2) :- | |
1070 | add_modified_vars_to_hyp(Hyps,TStmt,Hyps2). | |
1071 | %add_message(well_def_analyser,'Uncovered substitution in sequential composition: ',TStmt,TStmt). | |
1072 | ||
1073 | % add all modified vars as new hyp vars: new hypotheses and goals will thus refer to new version (like priming variables) | |
1074 | add_modified_vars_to_hyp(Hyps,TLHS,Hyps2) :- | |
1075 | (get_accessed_vars(TLHS,[],ModifiedVars,_Read) -> true | |
1076 | ; add_error(well_def_analyser,'Could not obtain modified vars:',TLHS,TLHS), ModifiedVars=[] | |
1077 | ), | |
1078 | maplist(construct_typed_var(Hyps),ModifiedVars,TModVars), | |
1079 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,TModVars,Hyps2). | |
1080 | ||
1081 | construct_typed_var(Hyps,ID,b(identifier(ID),Type,[])) :- | |
1082 | (get_hyp_var_type(ID,Hyps,Type) -> true | |
1083 | ; add_internal_error('Unknown identifier in hyps:',ID), Type=any). | |
1084 | ||
1085 | rename_expr(Hyps,Expr,RenExpr) :- get_renamed_expression(Expr,Hyps,RenExpr). | |
1086 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree),[get_texpr_id/2]). | |
1087 | construct_equal(TID,RenExpr, b(equal(TID,RenExpr),pred,[])) :- get_texpr_id(TID,_),!. | |
1088 | construct_equal(_,_,b(truth,pred,[])). % TO DO: deal with more complex assignments f(i) := E -> f' = f <+ {i|->E} | |
1089 | ||
1090 | process_seq_lhs_aux(assign_single_id(TID,Expr),Hyps,Options,Hyps2) :- !, | |
1091 | get_renamed_expression(Expr,Hyps,RenExpr), % rename in old context; e.g., if we have x:=x+1 | |
1092 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,[TID],Hyps1), | |
1093 | get_renamed_expression(TID,Hyps1,RenTID), | |
1094 | Eq = b(equal(RenTID,RenExpr),pred,[]), % print('Add: '), translate:print_bexpr(Eq),nl, | |
1095 | push_hyps_wo_renaming(Hyps1,[Eq],Options,Hyps2). %, portray_hyps(Hyps2). | |
1096 | process_seq_lhs_aux(assign(FTIDs,Exprs),Hyps,Options,Hyps2) :- !, | |
1097 | maplist(rename_expr(Hyps),Exprs,RenExprs),% rename in old context; e.g., if we have x:=x+1 | |
1098 | maplist(get_assigned_ids,FTIDs,TIDs), | |
1099 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,TIDs,Hyps1), | |
1100 | maplist(rename_expr(Hyps1),TIDs,RenTIDs), | |
1101 | maplist(well_def_analyser:construct_equal,RenTIDs,RenExprs,Equalities), | |
1102 | push_hyps_wo_renaming(Hyps1,Equalities,Options,Hyps2). | |
1103 | ||
1104 | % get assigned ids for things like f(x) := E or r'f := E | |
1105 | get_assigned_ids(b(Expr,_,_),TID) :- get_assigned_id(Expr,F), !,get_assigned_ids(F,TID). | |
1106 | get_assigned_ids(TID,TID). | |
1107 | ||
1108 | get_assigned_id(function(F,_),F). | |
1109 | get_assigned_id(record_field(R,_),R). | |
1110 | ||
1111 | % wd_like_conjunction(Construct,NewTypedVars,Conjunct1,Conjunct2) | |
1112 | wd_like_conjunction(conjunct(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1113 | wd_like_conjunction(implication(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1114 | wd_like_conjunction(precondition(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1115 | wd_like_conjunction(assertion(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1116 | wd_like_conjunction(witness_then(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1117 | wd_like_conjunction(select_when(A,B),[],A,B). | |
1118 | wd_like_conjunction(assertion_expression(A,_Msg,B),[],A,B). % Note: this has associated WD condition | |
1119 | wd_like_conjunction(any(Ids,A,B),Ids,A,B). | |
1120 | wd_like_conjunction(forall(Ids,A,B),Ids,A,B). | |
1121 | wd_like_conjunction(quantified_union(Ids,A,B),Ids,A,B). % rewritten | |
1122 | wd_like_conjunction(let_predicate(Ids,E,P),Ids,A,P) :- construct_let_eq_pred(Ids,E,A). | |
1123 | wd_like_conjunction(let_expression(Ids,E,P),Ids,A,P) :- construct_let_eq_pred(Ids,E,A). | |
1124 | wd_like_conjunction(let(Ids,E,P),Ids,A,P) :- A=E. % this is already a predicate | |
1125 | ||
1126 | ||
1127 | :- use_module(library(lists),[maplist/4,append/2]). | |
1128 | construct_let_eq_pred(Ids,E,Pred) :- | |
1129 | (ground(Pred) | |
1130 | -> conjunction_to_list(Pred,Ps), % enable predicate to be used both ways | |
1131 | maplist(deconstruct_eq,Ids,E,Ps) | |
1132 | ; maplist(construct_eq,Ids,E,Ps), | |
1133 | conjunct_predicates(Ps,Pred) | |
1134 | ),!. | |
1135 | construct_let_eq_pred(Ids,E,Pred) :- add_internal_error('Call failed: ',construct_let_eq_pred(Ids,E,Pred)),fail. | |
1136 | ||
1137 | construct_eq(TID,E,EqPred) :- safe_create_texpr(equal(TID,E),pred,EqPred). | |
1138 | deconstruct_eq(TID,E,b(equal(TID,E),pred,_)). | |
1139 | ||
1140 | % The constructs which have no WD condition of their own; they just require checking the arguments: | |
1141 | wd_transparent(truth). | |
1142 | wd_transparent(falsity). | |
1143 | wd_transparent(negation(_)). | |
1144 | wd_transparent(equivalence(_,_)). | |
1145 | wd_transparent(equal(_,_)). | |
1146 | wd_transparent(not_equal(_,_)). | |
1147 | wd_transparent(member(_,_)). | |
1148 | wd_transparent(not_member(_,_)). | |
1149 | wd_transparent(subset(_,_)). | |
1150 | wd_transparent(subset_strict(_,_)). | |
1151 | wd_transparent(not_subset(_,_)). | |
1152 | wd_transparent(not_subset_strict(_,_)). | |
1153 | wd_transparent(less_equal(_,_)). | |
1154 | wd_transparent(less(_,_)). | |
1155 | wd_transparent(less_equal_real(_,_)). | |
1156 | wd_transparent(less_real(_,_)). | |
1157 | wd_transparent(greater_equal(_,_)). | |
1158 | wd_transparent(greater(_,_)). | |
1159 | wd_transparent(finite(_)). | |
1160 | wd_transparent(partition(_,_)). | |
1161 | wd_transparent(value(_)). | |
1162 | wd_transparent(boolean_true). | |
1163 | wd_transparent(boolean_false). | |
1164 | wd_transparent(max_int). | |
1165 | wd_transparent(min_int). | |
1166 | wd_transparent(empty_set). | |
1167 | wd_transparent(bool_set). | |
1168 | wd_transparent(float_set). | |
1169 | wd_transparent(real_set). | |
1170 | wd_transparent(string_set). | |
1171 | wd_transparent(convert_bool(_)). | |
1172 | wd_transparent(convert_int_ceiling(_)). | |
1173 | wd_transparent(convert_int_floor(_)). | |
1174 | wd_transparent(convert_real(_)). | |
1175 | wd_transparent(add(_,_)). | |
1176 | wd_transparent(add_real(_,_)). | |
1177 | wd_transparent(minus(_,_)). | |
1178 | wd_transparent(minus_real(_,_)). | |
1179 | wd_transparent(minus_or_set_subtract(_,_)). | |
1180 | wd_transparent(unary_minus(_)). | |
1181 | wd_transparent(unary_minus_real(_)). | |
1182 | wd_transparent(multiplication(_,_)). | |
1183 | wd_transparent(multiplication_real(_,_)). | |
1184 | wd_transparent(mult_or_cart(_,_)). | |
1185 | wd_transparent(cartesian_product(_,_)). | |
1186 | wd_transparent(successor). | |
1187 | wd_transparent(predecessor). | |
1188 | wd_transparent(couple(_,_)). | |
1189 | wd_transparent(pow_subset(_)). | |
1190 | wd_transparent(pow1_subset(_)). | |
1191 | wd_transparent(fin_subset(_)). | |
1192 | wd_transparent(fin1_subset(_)). | |
1193 | wd_transparent(general_union(_)). | |
1194 | wd_transparent(interval(_,_)). | |
1195 | wd_transparent(union(_,_)). | |
1196 | wd_transparent(intersection(_,_)). | |
1197 | wd_transparent(set_subtraction(_,_)). | |
1198 | wd_transparent(relations(_,_)). | |
1199 | wd_transparent(identity(_)). | |
1200 | wd_transparent(event_b_identity). | |
1201 | wd_transparent(reverse(_)). | |
1202 | wd_transparent(first_projection(_,_)). | |
1203 | wd_transparent(first_of_pair(_)). | |
1204 | wd_transparent(event_b_first_projection(_)). | |
1205 | wd_transparent(event_b_first_projection_v2). | |
1206 | wd_transparent(second_projection(_,_)). | |
1207 | wd_transparent(event_b_second_projection(_)). | |
1208 | wd_transparent(event_b_second_projection_v2). | |
1209 | wd_transparent(second_of_pair(_)). | |
1210 | wd_transparent(composition(_,_)). | |
1211 | wd_transparent(ring(_,_)). | |
1212 | wd_transparent(direct_product(_,_)). | |
1213 | wd_transparent(parallel_product(_,_)). | |
1214 | wd_transparent(trans_function(_)). | |
1215 | wd_transparent(trans_relation(_)). | |
1216 | %wd_transparent(iteration(_,_)). % has a WD condition on index of iteration | |
1217 | wd_transparent(reflexive_closure(_)). | |
1218 | wd_transparent(closure(_)). | |
1219 | wd_transparent(domain(_)). | |
1220 | wd_transparent(range(_)). | |
1221 | wd_transparent(image(_,_)). | |
1222 | wd_transparent(domain_restriction(_,_)). | |
1223 | wd_transparent(domain_subtraction(_,_)). | |
1224 | wd_transparent(range_restriction(_,_)). | |
1225 | wd_transparent(range_subtraction(_,_)). | |
1226 | wd_transparent(overwrite(_,_)). | |
1227 | wd_transparent(partial_function(_,_)). | |
1228 | wd_transparent(total_function(_,_)). | |
1229 | wd_transparent(partial_injection(_,_)). | |
1230 | wd_transparent(total_injection(_,_)). | |
1231 | wd_transparent(partial_surjection(_,_)). | |
1232 | wd_transparent(total_surjection(_,_)). | |
1233 | wd_transparent(total_bijection(_,_)). | |
1234 | wd_transparent(partial_bijection(_,_)). | |
1235 | wd_transparent(total_relation(_,_)). | |
1236 | wd_transparent(surjection_relation(_,_)). | |
1237 | wd_transparent(total_surjection_relation(_,_)). | |
1238 | wd_transparent(seq(_)). | |
1239 | wd_transparent(seq1(_)). | |
1240 | wd_transparent(iseq(_)). | |
1241 | wd_transparent(iseq1(_)). | |
1242 | wd_transparent(perm(_)). | |
1243 | wd_transparent(empty_sequence). | |
1244 | wd_transparent(identifier(_)). | |
1245 | wd_transparent(lazy_lookup_expr(_)). | |
1246 | wd_transparent(lazy_lookup_pred(_)). | |
1247 | wd_transparent(integer(_)). | |
1248 | wd_transparent(integer_set(_)). | |
1249 | wd_transparent(real(_)). | |
1250 | wd_transparent(string(_)). | |
1251 | wd_transparent(set_extension(_)). | |
1252 | wd_transparent(sequence_extension(_)). | |
1253 | wd_transparent(struct(_)). | |
1254 | wd_transparent(rec(_)). | |
1255 | wd_transparent(record_field(_,_)). | |
1256 | wd_transparent(typeset). | |
1257 | ||
1258 | wd_transparent(external_function_call(F,_)) :- \+ external_fun_has_wd_condition(F). | |
1259 | wd_transparent(external_pred_call(F,_)) :- \+ external_fun_has_wd_condition(F). | |
1260 | wd_transparent(external_subst_call(F,_)) :- \+ external_fun_has_wd_condition(F). | |
1261 | ||
1262 | wd_transparent(operation_call_in_expr(_,_)). % the operations will be checked for WD independently | |
1263 | % PRE conditions are not part of WD checking | |
1264 | ||
1265 | wd_transparent(freetype_set(_)). | |
1266 | wd_transparent(freetype_constructor(_,_,_)). | |
1267 | wd_transparent(freetype_case(_,_,_)). % predicate to check if we match a given case | |
1268 | ||
1269 | % substitutions: | |
1270 | wd_transparent(skip). | |
1271 | wd_transparent(block(_)). | |
1272 | wd_transparent(parallel(_)). | |
1273 | wd_transparent(choice(_)). | |
1274 | wd_transparent(assign(_,_)). % TO DO: f(X) := E ==> f := f <+ {X|->E}, etc,... | |
1275 | wd_transparent(assign_single_id(_,_)). | |
1276 | wd_transparent(select(_)). | |
1277 | wd_transparent(select(_,_)). % TOD: Else only reached if all cases do not apply | |
1278 | wd_transparent(becomes_element_of(_,_)). % in classical B we do not have to check set not empty? | |
1279 | wd_transparent(becomes_such(_,_)). % in classical B we do not have to check satisfiability | |
1280 | wd_transparent(operation_call(_,_,_)). % I.e., we do not see checking PRE condition checking as part of WD checking | |
1281 | wd_transparent(var(_,_)). | |
1282 | ||
1283 | wd_transparent(witness(_,_)). | |
1284 | ||
1285 | % transparent with new quantified variables | |
1286 | wd_transparent(comprehension_set(_,_)). | |
1287 | wd_transparent(exists(_,_)). % WD must be proven universally for all subexpression | |
1288 | ||
1289 | ||
1290 | /* | |
1291 | Not yet covered: | |
1292 | ||
1293 | syntaxelement(kodkod(PId,Ids), Ids,[],[Ids],PId, pred). | |
1294 | ||
1295 | syntaxelement(operation_call_in_expr(Id,As), [Id|As], [], [As], [], expr). | |
1296 | ||
1297 | % rewritten: | |
1298 | syntaxelement(event_b_comprehension_set(Ids,E,P),[E,P|Ids], Ids,[Ids], [], expr/only_typecheck). | |
1299 | syntaxelement(lambda(Ids,P,E), [P,E|Ids],Ids,[Ids], [], expr). | |
1300 | ||
1301 | syntaxelement(quantified_intersection(Ids,P,E), [P,E|Ids],Ids,[Ids], [], expr). | |
1302 | ||
1303 | ||
1304 | TREE operations | |
1305 | ||
1306 | syntaxelement(let_expression_global(Ids,As,Expr), Exprs, Ids, [Ids,As], [], expr) :- % version used by b_compiler | |
1307 | append([Ids,As,[Expr]],Exprs). | |
1308 | syntaxelement(lazy_let_expr(TID,A,Expr), Exprs, [TID], [[TID],[A]], [], expr) :- | |
1309 | append([[TID],[A],[Expr]],Exprs). | |
1310 | syntaxelement(lazy_let_pred(TID,A,Expr), Exprs, [TID], [[TID],[A]], [], pred) :- | |
1311 | append([[TID],[A],[Expr]],Exprs). | |
1312 | syntaxelement(lazy_let_subst(TID,A,Expr), Exprs, [TID], [[TID],[A]], [], subst) :- | |
1313 | append([[TID],[A],[Expr]],Exprs). | |
1314 | ||
1315 | syntaxelement(compaction(A), [A], [], [], [], expr). | |
1316 | syntaxelement(mu(A), [A], [], [], [], expr). | |
1317 | syntaxelement(bag_items(A), [A], [], [], [], expr). | |
1318 | ||
1319 | syntaxelement(freetype_set(Id), [], [], [], Id, expr). | |
1320 | syntaxelement(freetype_case(Type,Case,Expr), [Expr], [], [], [Type,Case], pred). | |
1321 | syntaxelement(freetype_constructor(Type,Case,Expr), [Expr], [], [], [Type,Case], expr). | |
1322 | syntaxelement(freetype_destructor(Type,Case,Expr), [Expr], [], [], [Type,Case], expr). | |
1323 | ||
1324 | rlevent(Name,Section,_Status,_Params,Guard,_Theorems,_Actions,_VWitnesses,_PWitnesses,_Unmod,_AbstractEvents), | |
1325 | ||
1326 | ||
1327 | ||
1328 | seval /Users/leuschel/git_root/private_examples/ClearSy/2020/03_Mar/wd_timeout/invalidRef_welldef.mch | |
1329 | :wd | |
1330 | Analysis walltime: 183 ms | |
1331 | ||
1332 | Stats: [AXM/1084,THM/104,unsupported/7,not_discharged_po/545,discharged_po/704,caval__rule__1__compute/61] | |
1333 | Stats: [unsupported/2,AXM/1085,THM/104,not_discharged_po/542,discharged_po/708,caval__rule__1__compute/61] | |
1334 | ||
1335 | Analysis walltime: 31 ms | |
1336 | Stats: [AXM/1085,THM/104,not_discharged_po/542,discharged_po/708,caval__rule__1__compute/61] | |
1337 | when reordering and not ignoring infos: | |
1338 | Analysis walltime: 17 ms | |
1339 | Stats: [AXM/1085,THM/104,not_discharged_po/540,discharged_po/710,caval__rule__1__compute/61] | |
1340 | ||
1341 | Tests: | |
1342 | ||
1343 | :wd a>0 & x>0 & x:1..10 & f:1..10-->INTEGER & f(x)=2 & x>1 | |
1344 | :wd %x.(x:2..4 | %x.(x:4..8|10/x)(2*x)) = x | |
1345 | ||
1346 | :wd x:NATURAL1 & y>=x & x mod y = x/y | |
1347 | -> same PO generated twice | |
1348 | ||
1349 | :wd f6 = %x.(x>10 & x<20|100) & res=f6(11) | |
1350 | :wd i5 = %x.(x>10|100+x) & i5(100) = 200 | |
1351 | seval /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/examples/B/ASTD/wetransfer-545a33/Case_Study_Handmade/TRAIN_CONTROL_M6.mch | |
1352 | ||
1353 | :wd n:NATURAL & a:1..n --> 1..10 & a /= {} & a(1)=1 | |
1354 | ||
1355 | -> support for $0 missing | |
1356 | -> support for ; and while (adding condition and invariant to loop body hyps) for transform | |
1357 | -> support for operation all in expression | |
1358 | -> Parallel in classical B: we could propagate guards from first to second subst; CarlaTravelAgency; but Atelier-B considers this to be not well-defined; each parallel construct should be WD on its own; we should make no assumption about order | |
1359 | -> CASE statement: treat cases specially | |
1360 | ||
1361 | % Processing file 2/3: /Users/leuschel/git_root/private_examples/ClearSy/2020/01_Jan/logxml_system_error/rule.mch | |
1362 | Proof of AXM took 169 ms, result=discharged ... | |
1363 | */ | |
1364 | ||
1365 | % --------------------------------- | |
1366 | % Annotating operations so that we can discharge WD conditions statically | |
1367 | ||
1368 | % this can be called once for all operations: it gets the hypotheses that are available for (all) operations | |
1369 | get_hyps_for_top_level_operations(Options,Hyps) :- | |
1370 | push_properties_invariant_hyps(Options,Hyps). | |
1371 | ||
1372 | :- public transform_machine_operation/7. | |
1373 | ||
1374 | % should call get_hyps_for_top_level_operations | |
1375 | % Note: should be run after global types are pre-compiled; otherwise we do not detect global constants | |
1376 | % TODO: pre-compile global sets before computing operations? | |
1377 | transform_machine_operation(OpName,OpResults,OpFormalParameters,Body,Hyps,Options,NewBody) :- | |
1378 | PO_Name = OpName, | |
1379 | format('Checking WD of OPERATION ~w~n',[OpName]), | |
1380 | ord_add_element(Options,po_label(PO_Name),Opt1), | |
1381 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,OpFormalParameters,Hyps6), | |
1382 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps6,OpResults,Hyps7), | |
1383 | ord_add_element(Opt1,discharge_po,Opt2), | |
1384 | ord_add_element(Opt2,reorder_conjuncts,Opt3), | |
1385 | transform_wd(Body,Hyps7,Opt3,NewBody), | |
1386 | print_wd_subst(NewBody). | |
1387 | ||
1388 | print_wd_subst(NewTExpr) :- | |
1389 | temporary_set_preference(pp_wd_infos,true,Chng), | |
1390 | translate:print_subst(NewTExpr),nl, | |
1391 | reset_temporary_preference(pp_wd_infos,Chng). | |
1392 | ||
1393 | push_properties_invariant_hyps(Options,Hyps4) :- | |
1394 | b_get_properties_from_machine(Properties), | |
1395 | empty_hyps(E), | |
1396 | b_get_machine_all_constants(Csts), | |
1397 | add_new_hyp_variables(E,Csts,OriginalHyps), | |
1398 | push_hyp(OriginalHyps,Properties,Options,Hyps1), | |
1399 | b_get_static_assertions_from_machine(StaticAssertions), | |
1400 | push_hyps(Hyps1,StaticAssertions,Options,Hyps2), | |
1401 | b_get_machine_variables(Vars), | |
1402 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps2,Vars,Hyps3), | |
1403 | b_get_invariant_from_machine(Invariant), | |
1404 | push_hyp(Hyps3,Invariant,Options,Hyps4). | |
1405 | ||
1406 | % --------------------------------- | |
1407 | ||
1408 | :- use_module(probsrc(bsyntaxtree), [def_get_texpr_ids/2]). | |
1409 | :- use_module(probsrc(btypechecker),[prime_identifiers/2]). | |
1410 | :- use_module(extrasrc(before_after_predicates),[prime_bexpr_for_ids/4, | |
1411 | before_after_predicate_for_operation_no_equalities/5]). | |
1412 | % try and prove invariant preservation using BA predicate | |
1413 | prove_invariant_preservation(OpName,TargetInv,Proven,Options) :- | |
1414 | push_properties_invariant_hyps(Options,Hyps), | |
1415 | b_get_invariant_from_machine(Invariant), | |
1416 | conjunction_to_list(Invariant,Invs), | |
1417 | before_after_predicate_for_operation_no_equalities(OpName,Paras,Results,BAPred,TChangedIds), | |
1418 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps,Paras,Hyps1), | |
1419 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps1,Results,Hyps2), | |
1420 | prime_identifiers(TChangedIds,NewPrimedIds), | |
1421 | add_new_hyp_variables(Hyps2,NewPrimedIds,Hyps3), | |
1422 | push_hyp(Hyps3,BAPred,Options,Hyps4), | |
1423 | formatsilent('~nProving invariant preservation for operation ~w~n',[OpName]), | |
1424 | (silent_mode(on) -> true ; translate:print_bexpr(BAPred),nl), | |
1425 | member(TargetInv,Invs), | |
1426 | def_get_texpr_ids(TChangedIds,ChangedIds), | |
1427 | prime_bexpr_for_ids(TargetInv,ChangedIds,PrimedTargetInv,ChangesPerformed), | |
1428 | (ChangesPerformed=false | |
1429 | -> Proven=unchanged % Invariant unaffected by event | |
1430 | ; prove_sequent_goal(PrimedTargetInv,Hyps4,Options) | |
1431 | -> Proven=proven | |
1432 | ; Proven=unproven), | |
1433 | (silent_mode(on) -> true | |
1434 | ; format(' ~w => ',[Proven]), translate:print_bexpr(PrimedTargetInv),nl). | |
1435 | ||
1436 | % well_def_analyser:prove_invariant_preservation(OpName,Target,Proven),fail. | |
1437 | ||
1438 | :- use_module(probsrc(tools_lists),[count_occurences/2]). | |
1439 | ||
1440 | analyse_invariants_for_machine(UnchangedNr,ProvenNr,UnProvenNr,TotPOsNr,Options) :- | |
1441 | findall(Proven,prove_invariant_preservation(_Op,_,Proven,Options),Ls), | |
1442 | count_occurences(Ls,Res), | |
1443 | (member(proven-ProvenNr,Res) -> true ; ProvenNr=0), | |
1444 | (member(unchanged-UnchangedNr,Res) -> true ; UnchangedNr=0), | |
1445 | (member(unproven-UnProvenNr,Res) -> true ; UnProvenNr=0), | |
1446 | TotPOsNr is UnchangedNr + ProvenNr + UnProvenNr. | |
1447 | ||
1448 | % TODO: look at weakest_precondition/3: no need to prime? | |
1449 | ||
1450 | % --------------------------------- | |
1451 | ||
1452 | ||
1453 | %% toplevel_wd_pos(Predicate, Hypotheses, ProofObligations). | |
1454 | % | |
1455 | % Returns a list of proof obligations for the given Ast, but only those relevant | |
1456 | % for the root node. | |
1457 | toplevel_wd_pos(b(Node, _, _), _, []) :- | |
1458 | wd_transparent(Node), !. | |
1459 | toplevel_wd_pos(b(Node, Type, Info), Hyps, WDPOs) :- | |
1460 | wd_like_conjunction(Node, _, _, _), !, | |
1461 | findall(PO, create_top_level_wd_po_conj_like(Node, Type, Info, Hyps, [discharge_po], PO, _), WDPOs). | |
1462 | toplevel_wd_pos(b(Node, Type, Info), Hyps, WDPOs) :- | |
1463 | has_top_level_wd_condition(Node), !, | |
1464 | findall(PO, create_top_level_wd_po(Node, Type, Info, Hyps, [discharge_po], PO, _), WDPOs). | |
1465 | toplevel_wd_pos(_, _, []). | |
1466 |