| 1 | | % (c) 2009-2025 Lehrstuhl fuer Softwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen, |
| 2 | | % Heinrich Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf |
| 3 | | % This software is licenced under EPL 1.0 (http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html) |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | :- module(refinement_checker,[ |
| 6 | | % tcltk_save_implementation_state_for_refinement/1, |
| 7 | | tcltk_save_specification_state_for_refinement/1, |
| 8 | | tcltk_load_refine_spec_file/1, |
| 9 | | tcltk_refinement_search/3, in_situ_ref_search/5, in_situ_model_check/5, |
| 10 | | reset_refinement_checker/0, |
| 11 | | %% impl_trans/3, |
| 12 | | %generate_new_tau_div_collapsed_state/3, |
| 13 | | %search_for_divergence/5, |
| 14 | | dvisited/1, |
| 15 | | valid_failures_model/2, |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | tcltk_nested_dfs_goal_cycle_check/1, |
| 18 | | nested_dfs_cycle_check/3 |
| 19 | | ]). |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | :- use_module(probsrc(module_information),[module_info/2]). |
| 22 | | :- module_info(group,csp). |
| 23 | | :- module_info(description,'A CSP refinement checker, along with determinism, deadlock and livelock checking.'). |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | :- use_module(library(lists)). |
| 26 | | |
| 27 | | :- use_module(probsrc(tools)). |
| 28 | | :- use_module(probsrc(self_check)). |
| 29 | | :- use_module(probsrc(debug)). |
| 30 | | :- use_module(probsrc(error_manager)). |
| 31 | | %:- use_module(probsrc(preferences). |
| 32 | | :- use_module(probsrc(translate),[translate_event/2, print_state/1]). |
| 33 | | :- use_module(probsrc(tools_printing), [print_error/1, format_error/2]). |
| 34 | | |
| 35 | | :- use_module(probsrc(state_space)). |
| 36 | | |
| 37 | | :- use_module(library(random)). |
| 38 | | :- use_module(probsrc(tools_meta),[safe_on_exception/3]). |
| 39 | | |
| 40 | | user_consult_without_redefine_warning(File) :- |
| 41 | | get_set_optional_prolog_flag(redefine_warnings, Old, off), |
| 42 | | get_set_optional_prolog_flag(single_var_warnings, Old2, off), |
| 43 | | (safe_on_exception(Exc, |
| 44 | | load_files(File,[compilation_mode(assert_all)]), |
| 45 | | (nl,print('Exception occurred:'),print(Exc),nl,fail)) |
| 46 | | -> OK=true ; OK=false), |
| 47 | | get_set_optional_prolog_flag(redefine_warnings, _, Old), |
| 48 | | get_set_optional_prolog_flag(single_var_warnings, _, Old2), |
| 49 | | OK=true. |
| 50 | | |
| 51 | | tcltk_save_specification_state_for_refinement(File) :- |
| 52 | | printsilent('saving XSB Specification state to: '), printsilent(File),nls, |
| 53 | | tell(File), print_specification_state_space_for_refinement, told, printsilent(done),nls. |
| 54 | | |
| 55 | | print_specification_state_space_for_refinement :- |
| 56 | ? | ref_transition(From,Label,To), |
| 57 | | write_term(spec_trans(From,Label,To),[quoted(true)]), |
| 58 | | write('.'),nl, |
| 59 | | fail. |
| 60 | | print_specification_state_space_for_refinement :- |
| 61 | ? | not_all_transitions_added(ID), |
| 62 | | write_term(spec_not_all_transitions_added(ID),[quoted(true)]), |
| 63 | | write('.'),nl, |
| 64 | | fail. |
| 65 | | print_specification_state_space_for_refinement :- |
| 66 | | max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(ID), |
| 67 | | write_term(spec_max_reached_for_node(ID),[quoted(true)]), |
| 68 | | write('.'),nl, |
| 69 | | fail. |
| 70 | | print_specification_state_space_for_refinement :- |
| 71 | ? | (not_all_transitions_added(_) -> true ; |
| 72 | | portray_clause((spec_not_all_transitions_added(_) :- fail)) |
| 73 | | ), |
| 74 | | (max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(_) -> true ; |
| 75 | | portray_clause((spec_max_reached_for_node(_) :- fail)) |
| 76 | | ), |
| 77 | ? | ((max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(_); not_all_transitions_added(_)) |
| 78 | | -> portray_clause((spec_completely_explored :- fail)) |
| 79 | | ; portray_clause((spec_completely_explored :- true)) |
| 80 | | ). |
| 81 | | % TO DO: also generate facts for spec_stable (as we eliminate the tau transitions in ref_transition) |
| 82 | | |
| 83 | ? | ref_transition(From,Label,To) :- ref_transition(From,Label,To,[From]). |
| 84 | | |
| 85 | | ref_transition(From,Label,To,_TauList) :- |
| 86 | ? | transition(From,Action1,To1), |
| 87 | | (functor(Action1,'$setup_constants',_) |
| 88 | | -> ref_transition(To1,Label,To) |
| 89 | | ; ref_generate_label(Action1,Label1), |
| 90 | | %(Label1 = tau % we now now longer expand tau transitions in spec_trans |
| 91 | | % -> \+ member(To1,TauList), /* no loop */ |
| 92 | | % ref_transition(To1,Label,To,[To1|TauList]) |
| 93 | | % ; |
| 94 | | Label=Label1, To=To1 |
| 95 | | %) |
| 96 | | ). |
| 97 | | |
| 98 | | :- use_module(probsrc(specfile),[animation_mode/1,csp_mode/0,csp_with_bz_mode/0]). |
| 99 | | ref_generate_label(Action,Label) :- |
| 100 | | ((functor(Action,'$initialise_machine',_) ; functor(Action,start_cspm_MAIN,_)) |
| 101 | | -> Label = '$initialise_machine' |
| 102 | | ; (Action=tau(_), |
| 103 | | \+ animation_mode(b) |
| 104 | | -> Label=tau |
| 105 | | ; translate_event(Action,Label)) |
| 106 | | ). |
| 107 | | |
| 108 | | % these facts can also be found in the _refine_spec.P files |
| 109 | | :- volatile spec_trans/3. |
| 110 | | :- dynamic spec_trans/3. |
| 111 | | :- dynamic spec_max_reached_for_node/1, spec_not_all_transitions_added/1, spec_completely_explored/0. |
| 112 | | reset_refine_spec :- |
| 113 | | retractall(spec_trans(_,_,_)), |
| 114 | | retractall(spec_max_reached_for_node(_)), |
| 115 | | retractall(spec_not_all_transitions_added(_)), |
| 116 | | retractall(spec_completely_explored), |
| 117 | | (csp_with_bz_mode -> debug_println(10,csp_and_b_mode), |
| 118 | | assertz((spec_trans(From,Label,To) :- impl_trans_cspb(From,Label,To))) |
| 119 | | ; % use same transition system for abstraction and implementation |
| 120 | | assertz((spec_trans(From,Label,To) :- impl_trans(From,Label,To))) |
| 121 | | ), |
| 122 | | assertz((spec_not_all_transitions_added(From) :- not_all_transitions_added(From))), |
| 123 | | assertz((spec_max_reached_for_node(From) :- max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(From))), |
| 124 | | assertz((spec_completely_explored :- max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(_); not_all_transitions_added(_))). |
| 125 | | |
| 126 | | :- public impl_trans_cspb/3. % asserted above in spec_trans |
| 127 | | impl_trans_cspb(From,Label,To) :- |
| 128 | ? | impl_trans(From,X,To),translate_csp_b_event(X,X1), |
| 129 | | % print(translated_event(X1)),nl, |
| 130 | | (var(Label) -> Label=X |
| 131 | ? | ; translate_csp_b_event(Label,Label1),X1==Label1). |
| 132 | | |
| 133 | | %spec_trans(From,Label,To) :- impl_trans(From,Label,To). |
| 134 | | %spec_trans(_,_,_) :- fail. |
| 135 | | spec_max_reached_for_node(_) :- fail. |
| 136 | | spec_not_all_transitions_added(_) :- fail. |
| 137 | | spec_completely_explored :- fail. |
| 138 | | % spec_stable(_). |
| 139 | | |
| 140 | | % summaring of the set closures |
| 141 | | reduce_channel_set(_Actions,closure([]),[]). |
| 142 | | reduce_channel_set(Actions,closure([tuple([Channel])|Tail]),List) :- |
| 143 | | expand_symbolic_set(closure([tuple([Channel])]),HdList,_C), |
| 144 | | return_csp_closure_value(HdList,AllChannelEvents), |
| 145 | | list_to_ord_set(AllChannelEvents,HdSet), |
| 146 | | ord_intersection(HdSet,Actions,InterSet), |
| 147 | | ( ord_seteq(InterSet,HdSet) -> |
| 148 | ? | reduce_channel_set(Actions,closure(Tail),T), |
| 149 | | ord_union([Channel],T,List) |
| 150 | | ; |
| 151 | ? | reduce_channel_set(Actions,closure(Tail),T), |
| 152 | | ord_union(InterSet,T,List) |
| 153 | | ). |
| 154 | | reduce_channel_set(_Actions,Cl,_L) :- |
| 155 | | add_internal_error('Internal Error: Type error; expected closure: ',Cl),fail. |
| 156 | | |
| 157 | | /* --------------------------------------------------- */ |
| 158 | | /* REFINEMENT CHECKING */ |
| 159 | | |
| 160 | | %:- table not_refines/3. |
| 161 | | |
| 162 | | :- use_module(probcspsrc(haskell_csp), [evaluate_argument/2,is_not_infinite_type/1,ignore_infinite_datatypes/0]). |
| 163 | | :- use_module(probcspsrc(csp_sets), [expand_symbolic_set/3]). |
| 164 | | :- use_module(probsrc(translate), [return_csp_closure_value/2]). |
| 165 | | |
| 166 | | :- dynamic not_refines_table/3,not_refusals_table/3. |
| 167 | | |
| 168 | | %not_failure_refines(F,X,YList,C) :- print(not_failure_refines(F,X,YList,C)),nl,fail. |
| 169 | | not_failure_refines(singleton_failures,X,YList,[not_enabled(A)|_T]) :- % Singleton Failures |
| 170 | | spec_trans_all(YList,A), |
| 171 | | \+(impl_trans(X,A,_)), /* TO DO: handle tau for CSP */ |
| 172 | | check_impl_trans_complete(X), |
| 173 | | print_message(cannot_do(A)). |
| 174 | | not_failure_refines(failures,X,YList,[cannot_refuse_compl(AllXActions),cannot_refuse(ReducedRefuseSet)|_T]) :- |
| 175 | | % CSP Failures |
| 176 | | impl_stable(X), % only need to check if X is stable |
| 177 | | impl_all_possible_actions(X,AllXActions), |
| 178 | | \+ find_failure_abstraction(YList,AllXActions), % if satisfied => an X action can be refused at the current state of Y |
| 179 | | check_impl_trans_complete(X), % AllXActions are not complete, counter-example could be spurios ! |
| 180 | | % note: we can use ord_subset since setof returns sorted lists |
| 181 | ? | get_reduced_refused_set(AllXActions,ReducedRefuseSet), |
| 182 | | debug_println(19,cannot_refuse_compl(AllXActions)), |
| 183 | | debug_println(19,cannot_refuse(ReducedRefuseSet)). |
| 184 | | not_failure_refines(failure_divergences,X,YList,T) :- |
| 185 | ? | (not_failure_refines(failures,X,YList,T) |
| 186 | | -> true /* not we have already checked for divergence in YList in not_refines */ |
| 187 | | ; impl_diverges(X), T=[spec_cannot_diverge|_T]). |
| 188 | | |
| 189 | | |
| 190 | | :- dynamic ref_check_incomplete/0. |
| 191 | | check_impl_trans_complete(X) :- impl_trans_not_complete(X),!, |
| 192 | | assert_ref_check_incomplete(X). |
| 193 | | check_impl_trans_complete(_). |
| 194 | | |
| 195 | | assert_ref_check_incomplete(ID) :- |
| 196 | | (ref_check_incomplete -> true ; assertz(ref_check_incomplete)), |
| 197 | | format(user_error,'Refinement check incomplete for state: ~w~n',[ID]). |
| 198 | | |
| 199 | | :- use_module(library(ordsets)). |
| 200 | | find_failure_abstraction([AbsState|_T],AllXActions) :- |
| 201 | | spec_stable(AbsState), |
| 202 | | spec_all_possible_actions(AbsState,AllAbsActions), |
| 203 | | % note: we can use ord_subset as setof returns sorted lists |
| 204 | | ord_subset(AllAbsActions,AllXActions), |
| 205 | | !. % we have found an abstract state whose failures is a superset of X's failures |
| 206 | | find_failure_abstraction([_|T],AllXActions) :- |
| 207 | | find_failure_abstraction(T,AllXActions). |
| 208 | | |
| 209 | | |
| 210 | | get_reduced_refused_set(_,RefusedSet) :- animation_mode(b),!, |
| 211 | | RefusedSet = ['$UNKNOWN']. % TODO: get all operations at list and build complement ?? |
| 212 | | get_reduced_refused_set(AllXActions,ReducedRefuseSet) :- |
| 213 | | get_refused_set3(AllXActions,Closure,RefusedSet), |
| 214 | ? | reduce_channel_set(RefusedSet,Closure,ReducedRefuseSet). |
| 215 | | |
| 216 | | get_refused_set(_,RefusedSet) :- animation_mode(b),!, |
| 217 | | RefusedSet = ['$UNKNOWN']. |
| 218 | | get_refused_set(AllXActions,RefusedSet) :- |
| 219 | | get_refused_set3(AllXActions,_,RefusedSet). |
| 220 | | |
| 221 | | get_refused_set3(AllXActions,R,RefusedSet) :- |
| 222 | | evaluate_argument('Events',R), |
| 223 | | expand_symbolic_set(R,R1,_C), |
| 224 | | (csp_with_bz_mode -> |
| 225 | | l_translate_csp_b_event(AllXActions,AllXActionsNew), |
| 226 | | l_translate_csp_b_event(R1,R2) |
| 227 | | ; AllXActionsNew=AllXActions, |
| 228 | | R2=R1 |
| 229 | | ), |
| 230 | | return_csp_closure_value(R2,AllPossibleEvents), |
| 231 | | list_to_ord_set(AllPossibleEvents,AllEventsSet), |
| 232 | | list_to_ord_set(AllXActionsNew,AllXActionsSet), |
| 233 | | ord_subtract(AllEventsSet,AllXActionsSet,RefusedSet). |
| 234 | | |
| 235 | | spec_stable(State) :- |
| 236 | | get_tau_closure(State,_,stable,_). |
| 237 | | % \+ spec_trans(State,tau,_). |
| 238 | | impl_stable(State) :- |
| 239 | | get_tau_closure(State,_,stable,_). |
| 240 | | % \+ impl_trans(State,tau,_). |
| 241 | | spec_possible_action(State,Action) :- |
| 242 | | setof(A,NState^spec_trans(State,A,NState),As), member(Action,As). |
| 243 | | spec_all_possible_actions(State,ActionList) :- |
| 244 | | (setof(A,NState^spec_trans(State,A,NState),ActionList) -> true ; ActionList=[]). |
| 245 | | impl_all_possible_actions(State,ActionList) :- |
| 246 | | (setof(A,NState^impl_trans(State,A,NState),ActionList) -> true ; ActionList=[]). |
| 247 | | |
| 248 | | spec_trans_all([State|MoreStates],Action) :- |
| 249 | | spec_possible_action(State,Action), |
| 250 | | spec_trans_all2(MoreStates,Action). |
| 251 | | |
| 252 | | spec_trans_all2([],_ANY). |
| 253 | | spec_trans_all2([State|T],Action) :- |
| 254 | | spec_trans(State,Action,_),!, |
| 255 | | spec_trans_all2(T,Action). |
| 256 | | |
| 257 | | % We check for the following assertion Spec [m= Impl, where m : {T,F,FD} |
| 258 | | % X is a current node from the implementation process Impl, and YList is |
| 259 | | % the current list of nodes of the specification process Spec. |
| 260 | | % The predicate not_refines(X,Y,TrX,TrY,EList,Model) can be read as follow: |
| 261 | | % Chech if X is not a Model-refinement of Y. |
| 262 | | % (TRUE => X does not refine Y ---> producing a counter example) |
| 263 | | % (FALSE (Failure Loop) => explore and search through the state spaces of Spec and Impl until a counter example is found or Spec is completelly explored) |
| 264 | | |
| 265 | | not_refines(X,Y,Tr,_,_YEnabled,_) :- % print_message(nr(X,Y,Tr)), %% |
| 266 | | % the configuration is already in the memo table: do not look for a counter-example here |
| 267 | ? | not_refines_table(X,Y,Tr),!,fail. |
| 268 | | not_refines(X,YList,TraceX,_,_,_) :- |
| 269 | | assertz(not_refines_table(X,YList,TraceX)), % add to memo table |
| 270 | | YList=[X|_],csp_mode,!,fail. % simple check if X appears in the list; if so we will never find a counter example; we could do a full member check (but not sure about performance) |
| 271 | | % in non csp_mode: root state of impl and spec are different |
| 272 | | not_refines(_X,YList,_TraceX,_TraceY,_YEnabled,_) :- |
| 273 | ? | \+(spec_completely_explored), |
| 274 | | spec_list_contains_unexplored_node(YList),!, %YEnabled=['$unknown'], |
| 275 | | fail. |
| 276 | | /* we don't know what the spec can do */ |
| 277 | | /* to do: improve for max_reached_for_node (if we know max>0) */ |
| 278 | | not_refines(X,YList,TraceX,_TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- /* use failure refinement */ |
| 279 | ? | not_failure_refines(FailuresModel,X,YList,TraceX), |
| 280 | | findall(AA,spec_par_trans(YList,AA,_),YEnabledList). |
| 281 | | not_refines(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- |
| 282 | | get_tau_closure(X,_Closure,Stable,_Diverges), |
| 283 | | Stable=unstable_prio(Dest),!, % only perform tau priority action |
| 284 | ? | TraceX = [go(tau,X2)|TX], member(X2,Dest), |
| 285 | ? | not_refines(X2,YList,TX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel). |
| 286 | | not_refines(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- |
| 287 | ? | do_one_trace_step_ahead(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel). |
| 288 | | |
| 289 | | do_one_trace_step_ahead(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- |
| 290 | | TraceX = [go(A,X2)|TX], |
| 291 | ? | impl_trans(X,A,X2), |
| 292 | | (A = tau |
| 293 | ? | -> not_refines(X2,YList,TX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) |
| 294 | | ; (setof(Y2,spec_par_trans(YList,A,Y2),YS) |
| 295 | | -> TraceY = [go(A,_)|TY], |
| 296 | | spec_tau_closure(YS,YTS,FailuresModel), % diamond compression of the LTS of the Spec process |
| 297 | ? | not_refines(X2,YTS,TX,TY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) |
| 298 | | ; findall(AA,(spec_par_trans(YList,AA,_),AA\=tau),YListChoices), /* no transition: refinement false */ |
| 299 | | remove_dups(YListChoices,YEnabledList) % do we need to remove duplicated enabled actions here? |
| 300 | | ) |
| 301 | | ). |
| 302 | | |
| 303 | | % Refusal traces are of the form <X1,a1,X2,a2,...,Xn> |
| 304 | | % where X1..Xn are the refused sets, a1 -> a2 -> ... -> an is the event trace beginning from the initial state. |
| 305 | | % We need to keep track of the whole refusal trace beginning from the initial state |
| 306 | | % in order to prove if the Impl process is a refusal refinement of the Spec process. |
| 307 | | |
| 308 | | % Notion: At each point we must check if Impl has the same refusal trace prefix as Spec in |
| 309 | | % order to continue checking of the refusal trace. |
| 310 | | |
| 311 | | % TODO: Comments, which explain the refusal based refinement algorithm, are missing!!! |
| 312 | | |
| 313 | | not_refusals(X,Y,_TrX,_TrY,RefusalTraceX,_RefusalTraceY,_YEnabled,_RefusalModel) :- |
| 314 | | not_refusals_table(X,Y,RefusalTraceX),!,fail. |
| 315 | | not_refusals(X,YList,_TrX,_TrY,RefusalTrace,_RefusalTraceY,_YEnabled,_RefusalModel) :- |
| 316 | | assertz(not_refusals_table(X,YList,RefusalTrace)), |
| 317 | | YList=[X|_],csp_mode,!,fail. |
| 318 | | not_refusals(_X,YList,_TraceX,_TraceY,_RefusalTraceX,_RefusalTraceY,_YEnabled,_RefusalModel) :- |
| 319 | ? | \+(spec_completely_explored), |
| 320 | | spec_list_contains_unexplored_node(YList),!, |
| 321 | | fail. |
| 322 | | not_refusals(X,_YList,_TraceX,TraceY,_RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,_YEnabledList,RefusalModel) :- |
| 323 | | (RefusalModel == refusals_div -> |
| 324 | | impl_diverges(X), |
| 325 | | append(TraceY,[spec_cannot_diverge],RefusalTraceY) |
| 326 | | ; fail |
| 327 | | ). |
| 328 | | not_refusals(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,_RefusalModel) :- |
| 329 | | impl_stable(X), |
| 330 | | prefix(TraceX,TraceY), |
| 331 | ? | \+impl_trans(X,_A,_X2), % we have a deadlock here |
| 332 | | spec_does_not_deadlock(YList), |
| 333 | | %print('Deadlock in SpecY does not occur => FAILURE!'),nl, |
| 334 | | append(TraceX,[refuse('Sigma')],RefusalTraceX), |
| 335 | | findall(AA,(spec_stable_par_trans(YList,AA,_),AA\=tau),YListChoices), |
| 336 | | remove_dups(YListChoices,YEnabledList), |
| 337 | | get_refused_set(YEnabledList,RefusedSetY), |
| 338 | | append(TraceY,[refuse(RefusedSetY)],RefusalTraceY). |
| 339 | | not_refusals(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel) :- |
| 340 | | impl_stable(X), |
| 341 | | prefix(TraceX,TraceY), |
| 342 | ? | impl_trans(X,A,X2), |
| 343 | | impl_all_possible_actions(X,AllXActions), |
| 344 | | get_refused_set(AllXActions,RefusedSet), |
| 345 | | append(TraceX,[refuse(RefusedSet),go(A,X2)],NTX), |
| 346 | ? | check_go_step_refusal(A,RefusedSet,X2,YList,NTX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel). |
| 347 | | not_refusals(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel) :- |
| 348 | ? | unstable_state_with_enabled_visible_actions(X), |
| 349 | | prefix(TraceX,TraceY), |
| 350 | | %print(unstable_state_with_enabled_visible_actions),nl, |
| 351 | | RefusedSet=bullet, % the bullet set |
| 352 | ? | impl_non_tau_trans(X,A,X2), |
| 353 | | append(TraceX,[refuse(RefusedSet),go(A,X2)],NTX), |
| 354 | | check_go_step_refusal(A,RefusedSet,X2,YList,NTX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel). |
| 355 | | not_refusals(X,YList,TraceX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel) :- |
| 356 | ? | impl_trans(X,tau,X2), |
| 357 | | append(TraceX,[refuse(bullet),go(tau_direct,X2)],NTX), |
| 358 | | append(TraceY,[refuse(bullet),go(tau_direct,_)],NTY), |
| 359 | ? | not_refusals(X2,YList,NTX,NTY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel). |
| 360 | | |
| 361 | | check_go_step_refusal(Action,RefusedSet,NextXState,YList,NTX,TraceY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel) :- |
| 362 | | (setof(Y2,spec_par_trans_bullet(YList,RefusedSet,Action,Y2),YS) -> |
| 363 | | append(TraceY,[refuse(RefusedSet),go(Action,_)],NTY), |
| 364 | | spec_tau_closure(YS,YTS,failures), |
| 365 | ? | not_refusals(NextXState,YTS,NTX,NTY,RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,RefusalModel) |
| 366 | | ; |
| 367 | | RefusalTraceX=NTX, |
| 368 | | findall(AA,(spec_stable_par_trans(YList,AA,_),AA\=tau),YListChoices), |
| 369 | | remove_dups(YListChoices,YEnabledList), |
| 370 | | get_refused_set(YEnabledList,YRefusedSet), |
| 371 | | append(TraceY,[refuse(YRefusedSet)],RefusalTraceY) |
| 372 | | ). |
| 373 | | |
| 374 | | spec_does_not_deadlock([]). |
| 375 | | spec_does_not_deadlock([Y|Ys]) :- |
| 376 | ? | (impl_trans(Y,_A,_Y1) -> spec_does_not_deadlock(Ys) ; fail). |
| 377 | | |
| 378 | | spec_list_contains_unexplored_node([ID|T]) :- % TO DO: we could do this check when generating YList ? |
| 379 | | (spec_trans_not_complete(ID) -> assert_ref_check_incomplete(ID) |
| 380 | | ; spec_list_contains_unexplored_node(T)). |
| 381 | | |
| 382 | | spec_trans_not_complete(ID) :- spec_not_all_transitions_added(ID). |
| 383 | | spec_trans_not_complete(ID) :- spec_max_reached_for_node(ID). |
| 384 | | |
| 385 | | check_spec_trans_complete(ID) :- |
| 386 | | (spec_trans_not_complete(ID) -> assert_ref_check_incomplete(ID) ; true). |
| 387 | | |
| 388 | | spec_par_trans_bullet([Y|_],RefusedSetX,A,Y2) :- |
| 389 | | spec_stable(Y), |
| 390 | | spec_all_possible_actions(Y,AllYActions), |
| 391 | | get_refused_set(AllYActions,RefusedSetY), |
| 392 | | special_ord_subset(RefusedSetX,RefusedSetY), |
| 393 | ? | spec_trans(Y,A,Y2). |
| 394 | | spec_par_trans_bullet([Y|_],RefusedSetX,A,Y2) :- |
| 395 | ? | unstable_spec_state_with_enabled_visible_actions(Y), |
| 396 | | RefusedSetY=bullet, |
| 397 | | special_ord_subset(RefusedSetX,RefusedSetY), |
| 398 | ? | spec_trans(Y,A,Y2). |
| 399 | | spec_par_trans_bullet([_Y|YT],RefusedSetX,A,Y2) :- |
| 400 | ? | spec_par_trans_bullet(YT,RefusedSetX,A,Y2). |
| 401 | | |
| 402 | | special_ord_subset(SubSet,Set) :- |
| 403 | | %print(special_ord_subset(SubSet,Set)),nl, |
| 404 | | ( SubSet == bullet -> |
| 405 | | true |
| 406 | | ; Set == bullet -> |
| 407 | | fail |
| 408 | | ; |
| 409 | | ord_subset(SubSet,Set) |
| 410 | | ). |
| 411 | | |
| 412 | | % in case we have a state with enabled visible and non-visible actions |
| 413 | | % e.g. a -> STOP [> b -> STOP |
| 414 | | unstable_state_with_enabled_visible_actions(State) :- |
| 415 | | \+impl_stable(State), |
| 416 | ? | impl_trans(State,A,_), |
| 417 | | A\=tau. |
| 418 | | impl_non_tau_trans(X,A,X2) :- |
| 419 | ? | impl_trans(X,A,X2), |
| 420 | | A\=tau. |
| 421 | | |
| 422 | | unstable_spec_state_with_enabled_visible_actions(State) :- |
| 423 | | \+spec_stable(State), |
| 424 | ? | spec_trans(State,A,_), |
| 425 | | A\=tau. |
| 426 | | |
| 427 | | spec_stable_par_trans([Y|_],A,Y2) :- |
| 428 | | impl_stable(Y), |
| 429 | ? | spec_trans(Y,A,Y2). |
| 430 | | spec_stable_par_trans([_|YT],A,Y2) :- |
| 431 | ? | spec_stable_par_trans(YT,A,Y2). |
| 432 | | |
| 433 | | spec_par_trans([Y|_],A,Y2) :- |
| 434 | ? | spec_trans(Y,A,Y2). |
| 435 | | spec_par_trans([_|YT],A,Y2) :- |
| 436 | ? | spec_par_trans(YT,A,Y2). |
| 437 | | |
| 438 | | %:- block translate_csp_b_event(-,?). |
| 439 | | translate_csp_b_event(Event,R) :- |
| 440 | ? | ( with_csp_label(Event) -> remove_label_from_event(Event,'CSP',R) |
| 441 | | ; convert_to_csp_event(Event,R) % unified event in B mode (e.g. 'link(a,b)' instead of 'link.a.b') |
| 442 | | ). |
| 443 | | |
| 444 | | l_translate_csp_b_event([],[]). |
| 445 | | l_translate_csp_b_event([Event|T],[TEvent|R]) :- translate_csp_b_event(Event,TEvent),l_translate_csp_b_event(T,R). |
| 446 | | |
| 447 | | :- assert_must_succeed((remove_label_from_event('CSP:in','CSP',R),R=='in')). |
| 448 | | :- assert_must_succeed((remove_label_from_event('B:in','B',R),R=='in')). |
| 449 | | |
| 450 | ? | remove_label_from_event(Event,Label,R) :- split_atom(Event,[':'],List),remove(List,Label,RList),ajoin(RList,R). |
| 451 | | |
| 452 | | with_csp_label(Event) :- split_atom(Event,[':'],['CSP'|_]). |
| 453 | | |
| 454 | | convert_to_csp_event(Event,CSPEvent) :- split_atom(Event, ['(',',',')'], DotEls),ajoin_with_sep(DotEls,'.',CSPEvent). |
| 455 | | |
| 456 | | % compute tau closure of list of abstract nodes; fails if there is divergence in FD mode |
| 457 | | % (as no refine check counter-example will be found) |
| 458 | | spec_tau_closure(SpecList,TauClosure,FailuresModel) :- |
| 459 | | spec_tau_closure_aux(SpecList,[],TauClosure,no_div,DIV), |
| 460 | | %print(spec_tau_closure(SpecList,DIV,TauClosure, FailuresModel)),nl, |
| 461 | | (FailuresModel = failure_divergences |
| 462 | | -> DIV = no_div % if an abstract node diverges: it can do anything -> fail as no counter-example can be found |
| 463 | | % note: fail after computing; to be able to store information for other checks |
| 464 | | ; /* WARNING: if DIV=div then could it be that not all successor nodes will be in TauClosure ?? |
| 465 | | Maybe with internal choice & tau_skip we are safe ?? |
| 466 | | if so TO DO : fix */ |
| 467 | | true |
| 468 | | ). |
| 469 | | |
| 470 | | spec_tau_closure_aux([],Acc,Acc,D,D). |
| 471 | | spec_tau_closure_aux([SpecState|T],Acc,Res,DivSoFar,DIVRes) :- |
| 472 | | get_tau_closure(SpecState,SpecClosure,_,DIV), |
| 473 | | comb_div(DIV,DivSoFar,NewDivSoFar), |
| 474 | | ord_union(SpecClosure,Acc,NewAcc), |
| 475 | | spec_tau_closure_aux(T,NewAcc,Res,NewDivSoFar,DIVRes). |
| 476 | | |
| 477 | | %%%%%%%% DEAD CODE %%%%%%%%% |
| 478 | | /* |
| 479 | | old_spec_tau_closure(SpecList,Res) :- |
| 480 | | tau_closure2(SpecList,SpecList,Res). %, print(tau_closure(SpecList,Res)),nl. |
| 481 | | |
| 482 | | |
| 483 | | tau_closure2([],X,X). |
| 484 | | tau_closure2([H|T],Acc,Res) :- setof(Succ,new_tau_succ(H,Acc,Succ),Succs),!, |
| 485 | | ord_union(Succs,Acc,NewAcc), tau_closure2(Succs,NewAcc,NewAcc2), |
| 486 | | tau_closure2(T,NewAcc2,Res). |
| 487 | | tau_closure2([_|T],Acc,Res) :- tau_closure2(T,Acc,Res). |
| 488 | | |
| 489 | | % find a new tau successor which is not yet in the accumulator list |
| 490 | | new_tau_succ(H,Acc,Succ) :- spec_trans(H,tau,Succ), \+ member(Succ,Acc). |
| 491 | | % TO DO if Succ in Acc --> return info that there is divergence |
| 492 | | */ |
| 493 | | |
| 494 | | |
| 495 | | impl_trans(From,Label,To) :- /* need to improve efficiency of that : */ |
| 496 | ? | impl_trans_term(From,Action1,To1), |
| 497 | | (functor(Action1,'$setup_constants',_) |
| 498 | | -> impl_trans(To1,Label,To) |
| 499 | | ; ref_generate_label(Action1,Label), To=To1 % for in-situ refinement we do not need the overhead of this ! |
| 500 | | ). |
| 501 | | |
| 502 | | in_situ_model_check(SpecNodeID,ResTrace,Type,ModelStyle,MaxNrOfNewNodes) :- |
| 503 | | set_max_nr_of_new_impl_trans_nodes(MaxNrOfNewNodes), |
| 504 | | interruptable_perform_mc(Type,ModelStyle,SpecNodeID,ResTrace). |
| 505 | | |
| 506 | | :- use_module(probsrc(user_interrupts),[catch_interrupt_assertion_call/1]). |
| 507 | | :- use_module(extension('user_signal/user_signal'), [user_interruptable_call_det/2]). |
| 508 | | |
| 509 | | interruptable_perform_mc(Type,ModelStyle,SpecNodeID,ResTrace) :- |
| 510 | | evaluate_argument('Events',R), |
| 511 | | (is_not_infinite_type(R) -> true; assertz(haskell_csp:ignore_infinite_datatypes)), |
| 512 | | user_interruptable_call_det(catch_interrupt_assertion_call( |
| 513 | | refinement_checker: perform_mc(Type,ModelStyle,SpecNodeID,ResTrace)),InterruptResult), |
| 514 | | (InterruptResult=interrupted -> ResTrace=[interrupted], print('Assertion check was interrupted by user!!!'),nl |
| 515 | | ; printsilent('Assertion check completed.'),nls), |
| 516 | | retractall(haskell_csp:ignore_infinite_datatypes). |
| 517 | | |
| 518 | | :- public perform_mc/4. |
| 519 | ? | perform_mc('Deterministic',ModelStyle,X,T) :- !,deterministic_check(X,ModelStyle,T). |
| 520 | | perform_mc('DeadlockFree',ModelStyle,X,T) :- !, deadlock_check(X,ModelStyle,T). |
| 521 | | perform_mc('LivelockFree',_ModelStyle,X,T) :- !, divergence_check(X,T). |
| 522 | | perform_mc(Style,_ModelStyle,_X,T) :- add_internal_error('Internal Error: Unknown checking style: ',Style), T=none_so_far. |
| 523 | | |
| 524 | | % ----------------------- |
| 525 | | |
| 526 | | % DETERMINISM CHECKING |
| 527 | | |
| 528 | | deterministic_check(X,ModelStyle,ResTrace) :- |
| 529 | | det_check(X,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,ModelStyle), |
| 530 | | (TraceX==no_counter_example |
| 531 | | -> ResTrace=no_counter_example %,print_message('No refinement counter example found') used to be all return value |
| 532 | ? | ; inst_list(TraceX,ResTrace0), |
| 533 | | inst_list(TraceY,ResTrace1), /* convert pending free var into [] + go */ |
| 534 | | tcltk_execute_string_trace(X,TraceX), |
| 535 | | append(ResTrace0,[' At_last_step_specification_can_do_one_of:'|YEnabledList],ResTraceX), |
| 536 | | append(ResTraceX,[' Trace_of_the_left_specification:'|ResTrace1],ResTrace) |
| 537 | | ). |
| 538 | | |
| 539 | | det_check(X,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,ModelStyle) :- |
| 540 | | reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 541 | | cputime(T1), |
| 542 | | assertz(cur_det_id(X)), |
| 543 | | % computing the pre-deterministic refinement P' of P |
| 544 | | compute_predeterministic_process(X,PredRootId,ModelStyle), |
| 545 | | cputime(T2), |
| 546 | | %tcltk_interface: add_new_visited_expression(PredRootId,_Hash,[],root,off), |
| 547 | | spec_tau_closure([PredRootId],InitialsRootId,failures), |
| 548 | | ( ModelStyle=failure_divergences,determinism_check_div_found(PredRootId) -> |
| 549 | | dfs_search(PredRootId,false,true,TraceX),cputime(T3),print_state_from_id(X), |
| 550 | | print(' reaches a divergence.'),nl, |
| 551 | | print(TraceX),nl,TraceY=TraceX |
| 552 | | % after computing P' we check wheter P' is refinement of P: P' [F= P |
| 553 | | % if P' [F= P is true we proved that P is deterministic, otherwise P is not deterministic |
| 554 | ? | ;not_refines(X,InitialsRootId,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,ModelStyle) -> |
| 555 | | cputime(T3),print_state_from_id(X), print(' reaches a '), print('non deterministic choice'),nl, |
| 556 | | print(TraceX),nl |
| 557 | | ; cputime(T3),print_state_from_id(X),print(' is '),print('deterministic'),nl,TraceX=no_counter_example |
| 558 | | ), |
| 559 | | printsilent('% Generating P\' Time : '), D1 is T2-T1, printsilent(D1), printsilent(' ms'),nls, |
| 560 | | printsilent('% Checking P\' [F= P Time: '), D2 is T3-T2, printsilent(D2), printsilent(' ms'),nls, |
| 561 | | printsilent('% Overall Checking Time: '), D is T3-T1, printsilent(D), printsilent(' ms'),nls. |
| 562 | | |
| 563 | | reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check :- |
| 564 | | retractall(predet_node_presentation(_,_)), |
| 565 | | retractall(cur_det_id(_)), |
| 566 | | retractall(not_all_det_transitions_added(_)). |
| 567 | | |
| 568 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 569 | | %%%%%%%% Generating the pre-deterministic refinement P' of P %%%%%%%% |
| 570 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 571 | | |
| 572 | | :- dynamic generated_predeterministic_refinement/3,determinism_check_div_found/1. |
| 573 | | |
| 574 | | |
| 575 | | % initialising the root state of P' |
| 576 | | compute_predeterministic_process(RootNode,NewRootNode,ModelStyle) :- |
| 577 | | generated_predeterministic_refinement(RootNode,ModelStyle,NewRootNode), |
| 578 | | debug_println(9,'%%%% Pre-deterministic Refinement P\' has been already generated.'),!. |
| 579 | | compute_predeterministic_process(RootNode,NewRootNode,ModelStyle) :- |
| 580 | | (ModelStyle = failure_divergences -> CheckDIV=true; CheckDIV=false), |
| 581 | | get_tau_loop_closure1(RootNode,Closure,false), |
| 582 | | get_predeterministic_node_id1(NewRootNode), |
| 583 | | assertz(predet_node_presentation(NewRootNode,Closure)), |
| 584 | | debug_println(9,tau_closure(NewRootNode,Closure)), |
| 585 | | add_id_to_stack(NewRootNode), |
| 586 | | generate_predeterministic_process_state_space(NewRootNode,CheckDIV), |
| 587 | | assertz(generated_predeterministic_refinement(RootNode,ModelStyle,NewRootNode)). |
| 588 | | |
| 589 | | generate_predeterministic_process_state_space(RootNode,CheckDIV) :- |
| 590 | | % in case we found div state and we check for divergence as well then |
| 591 | | % do not explore the pre-deterministic state space any more. |
| 592 | | (CheckDIV=true,determinism_check_div_found(RootNode) -> fail; true), |
| 593 | | % otherwise explore the pre-deterministic state space until stack is empty |
| 594 | ? | pop_id_from_stack(NodeId),!, |
| 595 | | predet_node_presentation(NodeId,Closure), % tau loop closure already explored |
| 596 | | add_all_predeterministic_transitions_fail_loop(NodeId,Closure,CheckDIV,RootNode), |
| 597 | | debug_println(9,tau_closure(NodeId,Closure)), |
| 598 | | generate_predeterministic_process_state_space(RootNode,CheckDIV). |
| 599 | | generate_predeterministic_process_state_space(_RootNode,_CheckDIV). |
| 600 | | |
| 601 | | |
| 602 | | % simple stack implementation used for generating the pre-deterministic refienement P' of P |
| 603 | | :- dynamic not_all_det_transitions_added/1. |
| 604 | | |
| 605 | | add_id_to_stack(NewNodeId) :- |
| 606 | | asserta(not_all_det_transitions_added(NewNodeId)). |
| 607 | | |
| 608 | | pop_id_from_stack(NodeId) :- |
| 609 | ? | retract(not_all_det_transitions_added(NodeId)). |
| 610 | | |
| 611 | | :- use_module(probsrc(gensym),[gensym/2]). |
| 612 | | get_predeterministic_node_id1(NewId) :- |
| 613 | | cur_det_id(ID), |
| 614 | | ID1 is ID + 1, |
| 615 | | gensym('det',NewId), |
| 616 | | retract(cur_det_id(ID)), |
| 617 | | assertz(cur_det_id(ID1)). |
| 618 | | |
| 619 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 620 | | %%%%%%%% Computing SCCs %%%%%%%% |
| 621 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 622 | | |
| 623 | | |
| 624 | | :- dynamic predet_node_presentation/2, cur_det_id/1. |
| 625 | | |
| 626 | | get_tau_loop_closure1(State,Closure,Test) :- |
| 627 | | get_max_tau_loop_closure([State],[],[],Closure,Test). |
| 628 | | |
| 629 | | get_max_tau_loop_closure([],_LV,Closure,Closure,_Test). |
| 630 | | get_max_tau_loop_closure(Waiting,LoopVisited,Closure_so_far,MaxClosure,Test) :- |
| 631 | | Waiting=[State|Rest], |
| 632 | | (\+member(State,LoopVisited) -> |
| 633 | | get_tau_loop_closure(State,Closure,LoopVisited,Test), |
| 634 | | ord_add_element(LoopVisited, State, LoopVisited1), |
| 635 | | ord_union(Closure_so_far,Closure,Closure1), |
| 636 | | ord_intersection(LoopVisited1,Closure1,Visited,NewToClosure), |
| 637 | | ord_union(NewToClosure,Rest,Waiting2), |
| 638 | | ord_intersection(Visited,Waiting2,_Inter,Waiting1) |
| 639 | | ; |
| 640 | | Waiting1=Rest,LoopVisited1=LoopVisited,Closure1=Closure_so_far |
| 641 | | ), |
| 642 | | get_max_tau_loop_closure(Waiting1,LoopVisited1,Closure1,MaxClosure,Test). |
| 643 | | |
| 644 | | get_tau_loop_closure(State,Closure,LoopVisited,Test) :- |
| 645 | | setof(SCC,compute_tau_scc(State,State,LoopVisited,[],SCC,Test),SCCs), |
| 646 | | append(SCCs,Closure1), |
| 647 | | list_to_ord_set(Closure1,Closure). |
| 648 | | |
| 649 | | compute_tau_scc(State,RootState,LoopVisited,SCC,SCCRes,Test) :- |
| 650 | | \+memberchk(State,LoopVisited), |
| 651 | | \+memberchk(State,SCC), |
| 652 | ? | impl_trans_test(Test,State,tau,Succ), |
| 653 | | (Succ=RootState -> |
| 654 | | SCCRes=[State|SCC] |
| 655 | | ; |
| 656 | ? | compute_tau_scc(Succ,RootState,LoopVisited,[State|SCC],SCCRes,Test) |
| 657 | | ). |
| 658 | | compute_tau_scc(RootState,RootState,_LoopVisited,_SCC,[RootState],_Test). |
| 659 | | |
| 660 | | %----------------------------------------------------------- |
| 661 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 662 | | %%%%%%%% Computing all possible transitions from the current pre-deterministic state %%%%%%%% |
| 663 | | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 664 | | |
| 665 | | |
| 666 | | add_all_predeterministic_transitions_fail_loop(CurState,CurClosure,CheckDIV,RootNode) :- |
| 667 | ? | specify_possible_transition(CurState,CurClosure,Action,SuccClosure,CheckDIV,RootNode), |
| 668 | | add_predeterministic_transitions(CurState,CurClosure,Action,SuccClosure,_SuccState),fail. |
| 669 | | add_all_predeterministic_transitions_fail_loop(_NewRootNode,_Closure,_CheckDIV,_RootNode). |
| 670 | | |
| 671 | | specify_possible_transition(CurState,CurClosure,Action,SuccClosure,CheckDIV,RootNode) :- |
| 672 | | ((CheckDIV=true,length(CurClosure,N),N>1) -> |
| 673 | | % more than two states in closure means that we have tau loop scc in the original state space, |
| 674 | | % which is definitely a case of divergence |
| 675 | | assertz(determinism_check_div_found(RootNode)), |
| 676 | | assertz(transition(CurState,tau,no_id,CurState)), |
| 677 | | debug_println(9,transition(CurState,tau,specify,CurState)) |
| 678 | | ; true |
| 679 | | ), |
| 680 | ? | (impl_tau_transition_from_closure(CurClosure,SuccNode) -> |
| 681 | | % we add a random single tau transition leading to a state outside the closure of the current SCC |
| 682 | | % to the state space of P' |
| 683 | | Action=tau, |
| 684 | | debug_println(9,add_transition(CurState,tau)), |
| 685 | | get_tau_loop_closure1(SuccNode,SuccClosure,false),! /* no more transitions should be added */ |
| 686 | | ; |
| 687 | | % if state is stable then add a single visible event to the pre-deterministic refinement P' |
| 688 | | % for each visible event that the closure of states in P can perform |
| 689 | ? | get_visible_transition(CurState,CurClosure,Action,SuccNode), |
| 690 | | get_tau_loop_closure1(SuccNode,SuccClosure,false) |
| 691 | | ). |
| 692 | | |
| 693 | | impl_tau_transition_from_closure(Closure,SuccNode) :- |
| 694 | | %random_select(Node,Closure,_Rest), % random_select inserts a cut after unifying Node |
| 695 | | random_permutation(Closure,Closure1),!, |
| 696 | ? | member(Node,Closure1), |
| 697 | ? | impl_trans(Node,tau,SuccNode), |
| 698 | | \+memberchk(SuccNode,Closure). % |
| 699 | | |
| 700 | | get_visible_transition(State,Closure,Action,SuccNode) :- |
| 701 | | %random_select(Node,Closure,_Rest), |
| 702 | | random_permutation(Closure,Closure1),!, |
| 703 | ? | member(Node,Closure1), |
| 704 | ? | impl_trans(Node,Action,SuccNode), |
| 705 | | Action\=tau, |
| 706 | | % adding only one visible transition to the pre-deterministic state |
| 707 | | \+transition(State,Action,_TransID,_CurState). |
| 708 | | |
| 709 | | add_predeterministic_transitions(CurState,CurClosure,Action,SuccClosure,NextState) :- |
| 710 | | (ord_seteq(CurClosure,SuccClosure) -> |
| 711 | | (\+transition(CurState,Action,_TransID,CurState) -> |
| 712 | | assertz(transition(CurState,Action,no_id,CurState)), |
| 713 | | debug_println(9,transition(CurState,Action,pred1,CurState)) |
| 714 | | ; true % do not add any transition |
| 715 | | ) |
| 716 | | ; |
| 717 | ? | (predet_node_presentation(NextState,SuccClosure) -> % state already added to state space of the pre-deterministic refinement P' |
| 718 | | assertz(transition(CurState,Action,no_id,NextState)), |
| 719 | | debug_println(9,transition(CurState,Action,pred2,NextState)) |
| 720 | | ; |
| 721 | | get_predeterministic_node_id1(NextState), |
| 722 | | assertz(transition(CurState,Action,no_id,NextState)), |
| 723 | | debug_println(9,transition(CurState,Action,pred3,NextState)), |
| 724 | | assertz(predet_node_presentation(NextState,SuccClosure)), |
| 725 | | add_id_to_stack(NextState) |
| 726 | | ) |
| 727 | | ). |
| 728 | | |
| 729 | | %----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 730 | | |
| 731 | | impl_trans_test(IsTestCase,From,Label,To) :- |
| 732 | ? | (IsTestCase=true -> test_transition(From,Label,To) ; impl_trans(From,Label,To)). |
| 733 | | |
| 734 | | /* Examples for testing the implementation of get_tau_loop_closure1/3. */ |
| 735 | | %% :- discontiguous test_transition/3. |
| 736 | | :- dynamic test_transition/3. |
| 737 | | |
| 738 | | :- assert_must_succeed(( |
| 739 | | assertz(test_transition(2,tau,4)), |
| 740 | | assertz(test_transition(2,tau,3)), |
| 741 | | assertz(test_transition(3,tau,5)), |
| 742 | | assertz(test_transition(3,tau,11)), |
| 743 | | assertz(test_transition(4,b,6)), |
| 744 | | assertz(test_transition(5,tau,3)), |
| 745 | | assertz(test_transition(5,c,8)), |
| 746 | | assertz(test_transition(5,c,9)), |
| 747 | | assertz(test_transition(5,k,10)), |
| 748 | | assertz(test_transition(11,v,12)), |
| 749 | | assertz(test_transition(11,tau,13)), |
| 750 | | assertz(test_transition(11,tau,3)), |
| 751 | | assertz(test_transition(13,tau,11)), |
| 752 | | assertz(test_transition(13,w,15)), |
| 753 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 754 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(2,Closure1,true), Closure1==[2], |
| 755 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 756 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(3,Closure2,true), Closure2==[3,5,11,13], |
| 757 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 758 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(4,Closure3,true), Closure3==[4], |
| 759 | | retractall(test_transition(_,_,_)))). |
| 760 | | |
| 761 | | :- assert_must_succeed(( |
| 762 | | assertz(test_transition(22,tau,23)), |
| 763 | | assertz(test_transition(22,tau,24)), |
| 764 | | assertz(test_transition(23,a,28)), |
| 765 | | assertz(test_transition(23,tau,26)), |
| 766 | | assertz(test_transition(24,tau,25)), |
| 767 | | assertz(test_transition(25,tau,30)), |
| 768 | | assertz(test_transition(26,tau,27)), |
| 769 | | assertz(test_transition(27,tau,26)), |
| 770 | | assertz(test_transition(27,a,28)), |
| 771 | | assertz(test_transition(30,tau,24)), |
| 772 | | assertz(test_transition(30,a,27)), |
| 773 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 774 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(22,Closure1,true), Closure1==[22], |
| 775 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 776 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(26,Closure2,true), Closure2==[26,27], |
| 777 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 778 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(25,Closure3,true), Closure3==[24,25,30], |
| 779 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 780 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(30,Closure4,true), Closure4==[24,25,30], |
| 781 | | retractall(test_transition(_,_,_)))). |
| 782 | | |
| 783 | | :- assert_must_succeed(( |
| 784 | | assertz(test_transition(32,tau,34)), |
| 785 | | assertz(test_transition(34,a,36)), |
| 786 | | assertz(test_transition(34,tau,35)), |
| 787 | | assertz(test_transition(35,tau,37)), |
| 788 | | assertz(test_transition(35,tau,38)), |
| 789 | | assertz(test_transition(37,tau,35)), |
| 790 | | assertz(test_transition(37,b,40)), |
| 791 | | assertz(test_transition(38,v,39)), |
| 792 | | assertz(test_transition(38,tau,32)), |
| 793 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 794 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(32,Closure1,true), Closure1==[32,34,35,37,38], |
| 795 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 796 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(38,Closure2,true), Closure2==[32,34,35,37,38], |
| 797 | | retractall(test_transition(_,_,_)))). |
| 798 | | |
| 799 | | :- assert_must_succeed(( |
| 800 | | assertz(test_transition(102,tau,103)), |
| 801 | | assertz(test_transition(103,tau,102)), |
| 802 | | assertz(test_transition(103,tau,104)), |
| 803 | | assertz(test_transition(104,tau,103)), |
| 804 | | assertz(test_transition(104,tau,107)), |
| 805 | | assertz(test_transition(107,tau,104)), |
| 806 | | assertz(test_transition(102,tau,105)), |
| 807 | | assertz(test_transition(105,tau,102)), |
| 808 | | assertz(test_transition(105,w,106)), |
| 809 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 810 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(102,Closure1,true), Closure1==[102,103,104,105,107], |
| 811 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 812 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(107,Closure2,true), Closure2==[102,103,104,105,107], |
| 813 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 814 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(105,Closure3,true), Closure3==[102,103,104,105,107], |
| 815 | | retractall(test_transition(_,_,_)))). |
| 816 | | |
| 817 | | :- assert_must_succeed(( |
| 818 | | assertz(test_transition(202,tau,203)), |
| 819 | | assertz(test_transition(203,tau,202)), |
| 820 | | assertz(test_transition(203,tau,204)), |
| 821 | | assertz(test_transition(204,tau,203)), |
| 822 | | refinement_checker: reset_all_dynamic_state_predicates_for_determinism_check, |
| 823 | | refinement_checker: get_tau_loop_closure1(202,Closure,true), Closure==[202,203,204], |
| 824 | | retractall(test_transition(_,_,_)))). |
| 825 | | %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 826 | | |
| 827 | | :- dynamic dvisited/1. % true if a node has been seen during dfs traversal |
| 828 | | |
| 829 | | % ----------------------- |
| 830 | | |
| 831 | | % DEADLOCK CHECKING |
| 832 | | |
| 833 | | |
| 834 | | deadlock_check(X,ModelStyle,Trace) :- DLK=true, |
| 835 | | (ModelStyle=failure_divergences -> DIV=true ; |
| 836 | | ModelStyle=trace -> add_error(deadlock_check,'Trace model cannot be used for deadlock checking'), DIV=false |
| 837 | | ; DIV=false), |
| 838 | | dfs_check(X,Trace,DLK,DIV). |
| 839 | | |
| 840 | | :- dynamic dincomplete/0. |
| 841 | | dfs_check(X,ResTrace,DLK,DIV) :- |
| 842 | | retractall(dvisited(_)), retractall(tau_closure(_,_,_,_)),retractall(dincomplete), |
| 843 | | cputime(T1), |
| 844 | ? | (dfs_search(X,DLK,DIV,Trace1) -> |
| 845 | | cputime(T2),print_state_from_id(X), print(' reaches a '), printDD(DLK,DIV),nl, |
| 846 | | printsilent(Trace1),nls, |
| 847 | | inst_list(Trace1,ResTrace), |
| 848 | | tcltk_execute_string_trace(X,Trace1) |
| 849 | | ; dincomplete -> cputime(T2),print('No '),printDD(DLK,DIV), print('found so far for :'), |
| 850 | | print_state_from_id(X),nl, ResTrace=none_so_far |
| 851 | | ; cputime(T2),print_state_from_id(X), print(' is '),printDD(DLK,DIV), print('free'),nl,ResTrace=no_counter_example |
| 852 | | ), |
| 853 | | (silent_mode(on) -> true ; print('% Checking Time: '), D is T2-T1, print(D), print(' ms'),nl). |
| 854 | | |
| 855 | | dfs_search(X,_,_DIV,_) :- dvisited(X),!, %print(already_visited(X)),nl, |
| 856 | | % (DIV\=true, TO DO: check that we have not ignored tau or visible transitions in this loop) |
| 857 | | fail. |
| 858 | | %dfs_search(X,_,_DIV,_) :- % comment this clause in if you do not want omega to count as deadlock; FDR does ! |
| 859 | | % visited_expression(X,omega),!, assertz(dvisited(X)),fail. % this is a termination node; do not look for deadlock or other errors from it |
| 860 | ? | dfs_search(X,DLK,_,[deadlocks]) :- DLK=true,\+ impl_trans_term(X,_,_),!, % will compute transitions if necessary |
| 861 | | (not_all_transitions_added(X) -> (dincomplete -> assertz(dincomplete),fail) ; true). |
| 862 | | dfs_search(X,DLK,DIV,Result) :- |
| 863 | | get_tau_closure(X,Closure,Stable,Diverges), |
| 864 | | assertz(dvisited(X)), |
| 865 | | (DIV=true, Diverges=div |
| 866 | | -> Result = [diverges], debug_println(19,diverges(X,Closure)) |
| 867 | | ; Stable=unstable_prio(Dest) -> /* only perform the first priority tau transitions */ |
| 868 | | Result=[go(tau,Y)|R2], |
| 869 | ? | member(Y,Dest), dfs_search(Y,DLK,DIV,R2) |
| 870 | | ; % Stable=[X] -> |
| 871 | ? | Result=[go(A,Y)|R2], impl_trans(X,A,Y), dfs_search(Y,DLK,DIV,R2) |
| 872 | | % ; Result=[go(tau,Y)|R2], member(Y,Stable), dfs_search(Y,DLK,DIV,R2) |
| 873 | | ). |
| 874 | | |
| 875 | | |
| 876 | | printDD(DLK,DIV) :- (DLK=true -> print('deadlock ') ; true), |
| 877 | | (DIV=true -> print('divergence ') ; true). |
| 878 | | |
| 879 | | % ----------------------- |
| 880 | | |
| 881 | | % DIVERGENCE CHECKING |
| 882 | | |
| 883 | | divergence_check(X,Trace) :- DLK=false,DIV=true,dfs_check(X,Trace,DLK,DIV). |
| 884 | | |
| 885 | | |
| 886 | | :- dynamic tau_visited/2,tau_closure/4, tau_loop_back_node/1. |
| 887 | | |
| 888 | | impl_diverges(State) :- get_tau_closure(State,_,_,div). |
| 889 | | |
| 890 | | % we could provide an optimized version of the code below for just checking divergence |
| 891 | | % this would be sufficient in FD mode for refinement checking and in deadlock/livelock checking |
| 892 | | get_tau_closure(State,Closure,Stable,DIV) :- tau_closure(State,C,S,D),!,Closure=C, Stable=S,DIV=D. |
| 893 | | get_tau_closure(State,Closure,Stable,DIV) :- retractall(tau_visited(_,_)), |
| 894 | | compute_tau_closure(State,Closure,Stable,DIV). |
| 895 | | |
| 896 | | get_tau_closure2(State,Closure,Stable,DIV) :- tau_closure(State,C,S,D),!,Closure=C, Stable=S,DIV=D. |
| 897 | | get_tau_closure2(State,Closure,Stable,DIV) :- compute_tau_closure(State,Closure,Stable,DIV). |
| 898 | | |
| 899 | | compute_tau_closure(State,Closure,Stable,DIV) :- |
| 900 | ? | (tau_priority_transition(State,Span,_) |
| 901 | | -> Prio = prio, findall(To,tau_priority_transition(State,Span,To),Dest), sort(Dest,SDest), |
| 902 | | assertz(tau_visited(State,SDest)) % remember that we did not inspect all tau successors, only Dest |
| 903 | | ; Prio = all, findall(To,tau_transition(State,_,To),Dest), |
| 904 | | assertz(tau_visited(State,[])) |
| 905 | | ), |
| 906 | | %print(visiting(State,Dest,Prio)),nl, |
| 907 | | (Dest=[] |
| 908 | | -> /* stable state */ |
| 909 | | DivOccurred = no_div, TauClosure=[State], |
| 910 | | DStable = stable |
| 911 | | ; /* unstable state */ |
| 912 | | sort(Dest,SDest), |
| 913 | | comp_dest_tau_clos(SDest,[],DestTauClosure,no_div,DivOccurred), |
| 914 | | (((DivOccurred=no_div ; \+ tau_loop_back_node(State)), |
| 915 | | Prio=prio) |
| 916 | | -> DStable = unstable_prio(SDest), % it is safe to only treat the priority tau transitions in this node |
| 917 | | TauClosure = DestTauClosure % also: we do not need to add this node to the tau-closure |
| 918 | | ; DStable = unstable, |
| 919 | | ord_union([State],DestTauClosure,TauClosure) % also add node itself |
| 920 | | ) |
| 921 | | ), |
| 922 | | assertz(tau_closure(State,TauClosure,DStable,DivOccurred)), |
| 923 | | check_spec_trans_complete(State), |
| 924 | | Closure=TauClosure, DIV=DivOccurred, Stable=DStable. |
| 925 | | |
| 926 | | comp_dest_tau_clos([],CLOS,CLOS,DIV,DIV). |
| 927 | | comp_dest_tau_clos([Dest|T],CLOS_sofar,CLOS_RES,DIV_sofar,DIVRES) :- |
| 928 | | ((tau_visited(Dest,PriorList), /* we have seen the node before */ |
| 929 | | \+ tau_closure(Dest,_,_,_)) /* its treatment is not complete; i.e., we have a loop */ |
| 930 | | -> /* we have divergence */ |
| 931 | | % print(tau_loop(Dest,PriorList)),nl, |
| 932 | | % ord_union([Dest],CLOS_sofar,CLOS_RES) % Dest already in closure |
| 933 | | DIV_sofar2=div, |
| 934 | | (PriorList=[] -> CLOS_sofar2=CLOS_sofar |
| 935 | | ; /* we did not add all successors of Dest yet */ |
| 936 | | retract(tau_visited(Dest,_)), |
| 937 | | assertz(tau_visited(Dest,[])), |
| 938 | | assertz(tau_loop_back_node(Dest)), |
| 939 | | findall(To,tau_transition(Dest,_,To),AllDestSuccs), |
| 940 | | sort([Dest|AllDestSuccs],SADS), % also add Dest; it was not yet added ?? <------- TODO: check |
| 941 | | ord_subtract(SADS,PriorList,DestIgnored), |
| 942 | | % print(adding_ignored_succs(Dest,DestIgnored)),nl, |
| 943 | | comp_dest_tau_clos(DestIgnored,CLOS_sofar,CLOS_sofar2,div,_) |
| 944 | | ), |
| 945 | | comp_dest_tau_clos(T,CLOS_sofar2,CLOS_RES,DIV_sofar2,DIVRES) |
| 946 | | ; get_tau_closure2(Dest,DClos,_DStable,DIV), |
| 947 | | comb_div(DIV,DIV_sofar,DIV_sofar2), |
| 948 | | ord_union(CLOS_sofar,DClos,CLOS_sofar2), % combine states reachable via tau |
| 949 | | comp_dest_tau_clos(T,CLOS_sofar2,CLOS_RES,DIV_sofar2,DIVRES)). |
| 950 | | |
| 951 | | comb_div(div,_,div). |
| 952 | | comb_div(no_div,D,D). |
| 953 | | |
| 954 | | %%% size_of_tables/0 have only debugging purpose |
| 955 | | /* |
| 956 | | :- public size_of_tables/0. |
| 957 | | size_of_tables :- print_size_of_table(refinement_checker:not_refines_table/3). |
| 958 | | */ |
| 959 | | |
| 960 | | reset_refinement_checker :- |
| 961 | | retractall(abstract_spec_file(_)), |
| 962 | | retractall(tau_visited(_,_)), |
| 963 | | retractall(tau_loop_back_node(_)), |
| 964 | | retractall(not_refusals_table(_,_,_)), |
| 965 | | retractall(not_refines_table(_,_,_)), |
| 966 | | retractall(dvisited(_)), retractall(tau_closure(_,_,_,_)),retractall(dincomplete), |
| 967 | | retractall(generated_predeterministic_refinement(_,_,_)), |
| 968 | | retractall(determinism_check_div_found(_)). |
| 969 | | |
| 970 | | :- use_module(probsrc(eventhandling),[register_event_listener/3]). |
| 971 | | :- register_event_listener(clear_specification,reset_refinement_checker, |
| 972 | | 'Reset Refinement Checker.'). |
| 973 | | :- register_event_listener(specification_initialised,reset_refine_spec, |
| 974 | | 'Start-up Refinement Checker.'). % reset_refine_spec needs to know B mode or CSP mode |
| 975 | | :- register_event_listener(change_of_animation_mode,reset_refine_spec, |
| 976 | | 'Start-up Refinement Checker.'). % reset_refine_spec needs to know B mode or CSP mode |
| 977 | | |
| 978 | | |
| 979 | | refine_check(X,SpecY,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- |
| 980 | | retractall(ref_check_incomplete), |
| 981 | | retractall(not_refusals_table(_,_,_)), |
| 982 | | retractall(not_refines_table(_,_,_)), |
| 983 | | % ( (not_refines(X,InitialsY,TraceX,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) , TraceY=TraceX) |
| 984 | | (csp_mode -> |
| 985 | | evaluate_argument('Events',R), |
| 986 | | /* Needed for the Trace Debugger of the Refinement Checker. |
| 987 | | It prohibits to expand an infinite data type structures when a counter example has been found. |
| 988 | | TODO: Consider a more sophisticated solution. This code fragment adds unnecessary overhead to every assertion check.*/ |
| 989 | | (is_not_infinite_type(R) -> true ; assertz(haskell_csp:ignore_infinite_datatypes)) |
| 990 | | ; true), |
| 991 | | (spec_tau_closure([SpecY],InitialsY,FailuresModel), |
| 992 | ? | not_refines_or_refusals(X,InitialsY,TraceX0,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) |
| 993 | | -> |
| 994 | | nl,print_state_from_id(X), |
| 995 | | (ref_check_incomplete -> write(' may *not* be ') ; write(' is *not* a ')), |
| 996 | | print_ref(FailuresModel), |
| 997 | | print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(SpecY),nl, |
| 998 | | (debug_mode(off) -> true |
| 999 | | ; print('Trace of implementation '), print_state_from_id(X),nl,print(TraceX0),nl, |
| 1000 | | print('Trace of abstraction '), print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(SpecY),nl,print(TraceY),nl, |
| 1001 | | print('Events enabled at last step of '),print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(SpecY),nl, |
| 1002 | | print(YEnabledList),nl, |
| 1003 | | (impl_trans_not_complete(ID1) -> format('Impl. not complete, e.g., for ~w~n',[ID1]) ; true), |
| 1004 | | (spec_trans_not_complete(ID2) -> format('Abst. not complete, e.g., for ~w~n',[ID2]) ; true) |
| 1005 | | ), |
| 1006 | | (ref_check_incomplete -> TraceX=no_counter_example_found ; TraceX = TraceX0) |
| 1007 | | ; |
| 1008 | | (silent_mode(on) -> true |
| 1009 | | ; print_state_from_id(X), print(' is a '), print_ref(FailuresModel), |
| 1010 | | print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(SpecY),nl |
| 1011 | | ), |
| 1012 | | (ref_check_incomplete -> TraceX=no_counter_example_found ; TraceX = no_counter_example) |
| 1013 | | ), retractall(haskell_csp:ignore_infinite_datatypes). |
| 1014 | | |
| 1015 | | not_refines_or_refusals(X,InitialsY,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) :- |
| 1016 | | ((FailuresModel == refusals ; FailuresModel == refusals_div) -> |
| 1017 | ? | not_refusals(X,InitialsY,[],[],RefusalTraceX,RefusalTraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel), |
| 1018 | | TraceX=RefusalTraceX, |
| 1019 | | TraceY=RefusalTraceY |
| 1020 | | ; |
| 1021 | ? | not_refines(X,InitialsY,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel) |
| 1022 | | ). |
| 1023 | | |
| 1024 | | :- use_module(probsrc(tools),[get_tail_filename/2]). |
| 1025 | | % print state from abstract specification: |
| 1026 | | print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(ID) :- abstract_spec_file(File),!, |
| 1027 | | write_file(File), |
| 1028 | | (ID=root -> true ; write(':'), print_state_from_id(ID)). |
| 1029 | | print_abstract_spec_state_from_id(ID) :- print_state_from_id(ID). |
| 1030 | | |
| 1031 | | :- use_module(probsrc(specfile),[currently_opened_file/1]). |
| 1032 | | print_state_from_id(root) :- !, |
| 1033 | | (currently_opened_file(File) -> write_file(File) ; write(root)). |
| 1034 | | print_state_from_id(ID) :- visited_expression(ID,State), |
| 1035 | | print_state(State). |
| 1036 | | print_ref(FailuresModel) :- print(FailuresModel), print(' refinement of '). |
| 1037 | | |
| 1038 | | write_file(File) :- (debug_mode(on) -> write(File) |
| 1039 | | ; get_tail_filename(File,TF), write(TF)). |
| 1040 | | |
| 1041 | | :- dynamic abstract_spec_file/1. |
| 1042 | | tcltk_load_refine_spec_file(SpecFile) :- |
| 1043 | | print_message(loading_refine_spec(SpecFile)), |
| 1044 | | retractall(abstract_spec_file(_)), |
| 1045 | | user_consult_without_redefine_warning(SpecFile), |
| 1046 | | assert(abstract_spec_file(SpecFile)). % TODO: maybe store model name in refine_spec file |
| 1047 | | |
| 1048 | | tcltk_refinement_search(ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes) :- |
| 1049 | ? | refinement_search(root,root,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes). |
| 1050 | | |
| 1051 | | % A Procedure to do in_situ_refinement search: impl_trans & spec_trans are represented in the same state_space |
| 1052 | | % FailuresModel : {singleton_failures, failures, failure_divergences, trace} |
| 1053 | | in_situ_ref_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes) :- |
| 1054 | | % TO DO: redirect spec_trans,... to impl_trans .... |
| 1055 | | % retractall(spec_trans(_,_,_)), |
| 1056 | | % assertz((spec_trans(From,Label,To) :- impl_trans(From,Label,To))), |
| 1057 | | interruptable_refinement_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes). |
| 1058 | | |
| 1059 | | |
| 1060 | | interruptable_refinement_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes) :- |
| 1061 | | get_total_number_of_errors(Tot1), |
| 1062 | | user_interruptable_call_det( |
| 1063 | | catch_interrupt_assertion_call( |
| 1064 | | refinement_checker: refinement_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes)), |
| 1065 | | InterruptResult), |
| 1066 | | get_total_number_of_errors(Tot2), NrErrs is Tot2-Tot1, |
| 1067 | | (InterruptResult=interrupted |
| 1068 | | -> ResTrace=[interrupted], print("Refinement check was interrupted by user!!!"),nl |
| 1069 | | ; NrErrs>0 -> % real_error_occurred |
| 1070 | | add_error(refinement_check_fails,'Errors occurred while refinement checking:',NrErrs) |
| 1071 | | % we no longer fail; the error could also be a CSP type error, or something caused by the user spec |
| 1072 | | ; printsilent('Refinement check completed.'),nls |
| 1073 | | ). |
| 1074 | | |
| 1075 | | |
| 1076 | | valid_failures_model(failures,'F'). |
| 1077 | | valid_failures_model(failure_divergences,'FD'). |
| 1078 | | valid_failures_model(singleton_failures,'SF'). |
| 1079 | | valid_failures_model(trace,'T'). |
| 1080 | | valid_failures_model(refusals,'R'). |
| 1081 | | valid_failures_model(refusals_div,'RD'). |
| 1082 | | valid_failures_model(revival,'V'). |
| 1083 | | valid_failures_model(revival_div,'VD'). % not yet supported |
| 1084 | | |
| 1085 | | check_valid_failures_model(FailuresModel,ShortCut) :- |
| 1086 | | (valid_failures_model(FailuresModel,S) -> ShortCut=S |
| 1087 | | ; ShortCut='T', |
| 1088 | | add_warning(refinement_checker,'Invalid failures model: ',FailuresModel) |
| 1089 | | ). |
| 1090 | | |
| 1091 | | :- use_module(probsrc(debug)). |
| 1092 | | %:- use_module(probcspsrc(haskell_csp),[channel_type_list/2]). |
| 1093 | | refinement_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes) :- |
| 1094 | | debug_println(9,refinement_search(ImplNode,SpecNode,ResTrace,FailuresModel,MaxNrOfNewNodes)), |
| 1095 | | check_valid_failures_model(FailuresModel,ShortCut), |
| 1096 | | set_max_nr_of_new_impl_trans_nodes(MaxNrOfNewNodes), |
| 1097 | | cputime(T1), |
| 1098 | | refine_check(ImplNode,SpecNode,TraceX,TraceY,YEnabledList,FailuresModel), |
| 1099 | | cputime(T2), |
| 1100 | | D is T2-T1, formatsilent('% Refinement Check [~w=] CPU Time: ~w ms~n',[ShortCut,D]), |
| 1101 | | (possible_atomic_ref_check_result(TraceX) |
| 1102 | | -> ResTrace=TraceX %,print_message('No refinement counter example found') used to be all return value |
| 1103 | ? | ; inst_list(TraceX,ResTrace0), |
| 1104 | ? | inst_list(TraceY,ResTrace1), /* convert pending free var into [] + go */ |
| 1105 | | (tcltk_execute_string_trace(ImplNode,TraceX) -> true |
| 1106 | | ; add_warning(refinement_checker,'Could not execute trace in animator: ',TraceX) |
| 1107 | | ), |
| 1108 | | append(ResTrace0,[' At_last_step_specification_can_do_one_of:'|YEnabledList],ResTraceX), |
| 1109 | | append(ResTraceX,[' Trace_of_the_left_specification:'|ResTrace1],ResTrace) |
| 1110 | | %,print('Result trace: '),print(ResTrace),nl |
| 1111 | | ). %size_of_tables. |
| 1112 | | |
| 1113 | | possible_atomic_ref_check_result(V) :- var(V),!,fail. % the checker returns open-ended lists |
| 1114 | | possible_atomic_ref_check_result(no_counter_example). |
| 1115 | | possible_atomic_ref_check_result(no_counter_example_found). |
| 1116 | | |
| 1117 | | inst_list([],R) :- !,R=[]. |
| 1118 | ? | inst_list([go(tau_direct,_ID)|T],['GO:',tau|IT]) :- !, inst_list(T,IT). % NOTE : can be multiple taus now |
| 1119 | ? | inst_list([go(Op,_ID)|T],['GO:',Op|IT]) :- csp_mode,!, inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1120 | ? | inst_list([go(Op,_ID)|T],[Op|IT]) :- !, inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1121 | | inst_list([spec_cannot_diverge|T],['DIVERGES'|IT]) :- !, inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1122 | | inst_list([diverges|T],['DIVERGES'|IT]) :- !, inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1123 | | inst_list([deadlocks|T],['DEADLOCKS'|IT]) :- !, inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1124 | | inst_list([not_enabled(Op)|T],['NOT_ENABLED:',Op|IT]) :- !,inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1125 | | inst_list([determ(Op1,_ID1,Op2,_ID2)|T],['DETERMINISM_BY_EVENT:',Op1,Op2|IT]) :- !,inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1126 | | inst_list([cannot_refuse_compl(Ops)|T],Res) :- |
| 1127 | | append(['CANNOT_REFUSE_COMPL:'|Ops],IT,Res), |
| 1128 | ? | inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1129 | | inst_list([cannot_refuse(Ops)|T],Res) :- |
| 1130 | | append(['CANNOT_REFUSE:'|Ops],IT,Res), |
| 1131 | | inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1132 | | inst_list([refuse('Sigma')|T],Res) :- |
| 1133 | | append(['REFUSED_SET:','Sigma'],IT,Res), |
| 1134 | | inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1135 | | inst_list([refuse(bullet)|T],Res) :- |
| 1136 | | append(['REFUSED_SET:',bullet],IT,Res), |
| 1137 | ? | inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1138 | | inst_list([refuse(Ops)|T],Res) :- |
| 1139 | | append(['REFUSED_SET:'|Ops],IT,Res), |
| 1140 | ? | inst_list(T,IT). |
| 1141 | | |
| 1142 | | |
| 1143 | | tcltk_execute_string_trace(StartNode,Trace) :- /* can be useful for TestCase Generation */ |
| 1144 | | %state_space_reset, |
| 1145 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_execute_trace_to_node(StartNode), |
| 1146 | | % TO DO: check if not too expensive; usually StartNode will be root or an immediate successor of root |
| 1147 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(Trace),!. |
| 1148 | | tcltk_execute_string_trace(StartNode,Trace) :- |
| 1149 | | format_error('Could not execute trace from state ~w: ~w~n',[StartNode,Trace]). |
| 1150 | | |
| 1151 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([]) :- !. |
| 1152 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([spec_cannot_diverge|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1153 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([deadlocks|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1154 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([diverges|T]) :- |
| 1155 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1156 | ? | find_tau_trace_to(CurID,divergence,NewTrace,T),!, |
| 1157 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(NewTrace). |
| 1158 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([not_enabled(_)|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1159 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([cannot_refuse_compl(_)|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1160 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([cannot_refuse(_)|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1161 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([refuse(_)|T]) :- !, execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1162 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go('$initialise_machine',ID)|T]) :- |
| 1163 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1164 | | transition(CurID,Action,ID), |
| 1165 | | functor(Action,'$initialise_machine',_),!, |
| 1166 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(Action,ID), |
| 1167 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1168 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go('$initialise_machine',ID)|T]) :- |
| 1169 | | /* special case for CurID=root, as setup_constants get merged |
| 1170 | | into initialise_machine by refinement checker */ |
| 1171 | | current_state_id(CurID), CurID=root, |
| 1172 | | transition(CurID,Action1,ID1), |
| 1173 | | functor(Action1,'$setup_constants',_), |
| 1174 | | transition(ID1,Action2,ID), |
| 1175 | | functor(Action2,'$initialise_machine',_),!, |
| 1176 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(Action1,ID1), |
| 1177 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(Action2,ID), |
| 1178 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1179 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go('$initialise_machine',ID)|T]) :- |
| 1180 | | current_state_id(root), |
| 1181 | | transition(root,start_cspm_MAIN,ID),!, |
| 1182 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(start_cspm_MAIN,ID), |
| 1183 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1184 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go('$setup_constants',ID)|T]) :- |
| 1185 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1186 | | transition(CurID,Action,ID), |
| 1187 | | functor(Action,'$setup_constants',_),!, |
| 1188 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(Action,ID), |
| 1189 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1190 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go(tau,DestID)|T]) :- % could now be multiple taus ! adapt |
| 1191 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1192 | ? | find_tau_trace_to(CurID,DestID,NewTrace,T),!, |
| 1193 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(NewTrace). |
| 1194 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go(tau_direct,ID)|T]) :- |
| 1195 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1196 | ? | tau_transition(CurID,Action,ID),!, |
| 1197 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(Action,ID), |
| 1198 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1199 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go(Action,ID)|T]) :- /* <---- Node ID's have to be added to avoid problems !! */ |
| 1200 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1201 | ? | transition(CurID,Ev,TransitionId,ID), |
| 1202 | | translate_event(Ev,Action), |
| 1203 | | tcltk_interface:tcltk_perform_action(CurID,Ev,TransitionId,ID), |
| 1204 | | !, |
| 1205 | | execute_string_trace_to_node(T). |
| 1206 | | execute_string_trace_to_node([go(Action,ID)|_T]) :- silent_mode(off), |
| 1207 | | current_state_id(CurID), |
| 1208 | | format('Could not replay event ~w (reaching state id ~w) in state ~w~n',[Action,ID,CurID]), |
| 1209 | | debug_mode(on), |
| 1210 | | portray_state(CurID), |
| 1211 | | fail. |
| 1212 | | |
| 1213 | | portray_state(CurID) :- |
| 1214 | | current_expression(CurID,State), |
| 1215 | | format('State ~w : ~w~n',[CurID,State]), |
| 1216 | | transition(CurID,Ev,TransitionId,ID), |
| 1217 | | translate_event(Ev,Action), |
| 1218 | | format(' -- ~w : ~w --> ~w~n',[TransitionId,Action,ID]), |
| 1219 | | fail. |
| 1220 | | portray_state(CurID) :- |
| 1221 | | not_all_transitions_added(CurID), write(' not_all_transitions_added'),nl,fail. |
| 1222 | | portray_state(CurID) :- |
| 1223 | | max_reached_or_timeout_for_node(CurID), write(' max_reached_or_timeout_for_node'),nl,fail. |
| 1224 | | portray_state(_). |
| 1225 | | |
| 1226 | ? | tau_priority_transition(CurID,Span,ID) :- impl_trans_term(CurID,tau(TAUINFO),ID), priority_tau(TAUINFO,Span). |
| 1227 | | priority_tau(rep_int_choice(Span),rep_int_choice(Span)). % add wrapper in case Span is unknown |
| 1228 | | %priority_tau(tick(S),tick(S)). % can also hide choices: tick was visible; resolves external choice |
| 1229 | | priority_tau(int_choice_left(Span,_),int_choice(Span)). % TO DO: check span |
| 1230 | | priority_tau(int_choice_right(Span,_),int_choice(Span)). |
| 1231 | | % TO DO: hide if only taus possible; same with link parallel |
| 1232 | | % TO DO: replace span by position insisde CSP expression (in case of multiple copies of same operator) |
| 1233 | | |
| 1234 | | % first execute prioritized tau transitions from a source location if possible; otherwise any tau is ok |
| 1235 | | %%%%%%%%%%% DEAD CODE %%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 1236 | | /* |
| 1237 | | prioritized_tau_trans(CurID,ID,prio) :- tau_priority_transition(CurID,Span,_),!, |
| 1238 | | tau_priority_transition(CurID,Span,ID). |
| 1239 | | prioritized_tau_trans(CurID,ID,all) :- tau_transition(CurID,_Action,ID). |
| 1240 | | */ |
| 1241 | | |
| 1242 | ? | tau_transition(CurID,Action,ID) :- impl_trans_term(CurID,Action,ID), functor(Action,tau,_). |
| 1243 | | |
| 1244 | | % find a tau trace to a give id; id can also be 'divergence'; last arg is trace as difference list |
| 1245 | | :- volatile tau_trace_visited/1. |
| 1246 | | :- dynamic tau_trace_visited/1. |
| 1247 | | find_tau_trace_to(CurID,DestID,Trace,TraceTail) :- retractall(tau_trace_visited(_)), |
| 1248 | ? | find_tau_trace_to_aux(CurID,DestID,Trace,TraceTail). |
| 1249 | | |
| 1250 | | find_tau_trace_to_aux(CurID,DestID,T,Tail) :- |
| 1251 | | tau_trace_visited(CurID),!,DestID=divergence,T=Tail. |
| 1252 | | find_tau_trace_to_aux(CurID,ID,T,Tail) :- ID=CurID,!,T=Tail. |
| 1253 | | find_tau_trace_to_aux(CurID,ID,[go(tau_direct,ID2)|T],Tail) :- assertz(tau_trace_visited(CurID)), |
| 1254 | ? | tau_transition(CurID,_,ID2), |
| 1255 | ? | find_tau_trace_to_aux(ID2,ID,T,Tail). |
| 1256 | | |
| 1257 | | /* --------------------------------- |
| 1258 | | Printing gluing invariant is not used anywhere in the source code (DEAD CODE). |
| 1259 | | --------------------------------- */ |
| 1260 | | /* |
| 1261 | | :- public pgt/0. |
| 1262 | | |
| 1263 | | pgt :- print_gluing_invariant. |
| 1264 | | print_gluing_invariant :- print('GLUING INVARIANT'),nl, |
| 1265 | | not_refines_table(X,Y,_), |
| 1266 | | X \= root, |
| 1267 | | X \= concrete_constants(_), |
| 1268 | | print_state_as_expression(X), |
| 1269 | | print(' => '),nl, |
| 1270 | | print_states_as_disjunction(Y),nl, |
| 1271 | | print(' & '),nl, |
| 1272 | | fail. |
| 1273 | | print_gluing_invariant :- print(' TRUE'),nl. |
| 1274 | | |
| 1275 | | print_state_as_expression(ID) :- |
| 1276 | | visited_expression(ID,State), |
| 1277 | | print(' ('), |
| 1278 | | print_bindings(State), |
| 1279 | | print(') '). |
| 1280 | | */ |
| 1281 | | %print_spec_state_as_expression(ID) :- |
| 1282 | | /* need to be able to access state of specification machine ! */ |
| 1283 | | % print('not yet implemented, ID:'), print(ID). |
| 1284 | | /* |
| 1285 | | print_states_as_disjunction([]) :- print(' FALSE'),nl. |
| 1286 | | print_states_as_disjunction([S]) :- !, print_spec_state_as_expression(S). |
| 1287 | | print_states_as_disjunction([S|T]) :- !, print_spec_state_as_expression(S), |
| 1288 | | print(' or '), print_states_as_disjunction(T). |
| 1289 | | |
| 1290 | | :- use_module(probsrc(translate)). |
| 1291 | | print_bindings([]) :- print('TRUE'). |
| 1292 | | print_bindings([bind(Var,Val)]) :- !, |
| 1293 | | translate_bvalue(Var,TV), print(TV), |
| 1294 | | print('='), |
| 1295 | | translate_bvalue(Val,TVal), print(TVal). |
| 1296 | | print_bindings([bind(Var,Val)|T]) :- |
| 1297 | | translate_bvalue(Var,TV), print(TV), |
| 1298 | | print('='), |
| 1299 | | translate_bvalue(Val,TVal), print(TVal), |
| 1300 | | print_bindings(T). |
| 1301 | | */ |
| 1302 | | |
| 1303 | | |
| 1304 | | % ----------------------------------- |
| 1305 | | |
| 1306 | | |
| 1307 | | % TO DO: try use_module(library(mutdict)) from SICStus 4.7 |
| 1308 | | |
| 1309 | | :- dynamic outer_visited/2, inner_visited/2. % true if a node has been seen during inner dfs traversal for cycle detection |
| 1310 | | reset_nfs :- retractall(outer_visited(_,_)), retractall(inner_visited(_,_)). |
| 1311 | | assert_outer_visited(From,NBA) :- assertz(outer_visited(From,NBA)). |
| 1312 | | assert_inner_visited(From,NBA) :- assertz(inner_visited(From,NBA)). |
| 1313 | | |
| 1314 | | |
| 1315 | | % ----------------------------------- |
| 1316 | | |
| 1317 | | % use_module(extrasrc(refinement_checker)), refinement_checker:nested_dfs_cycle_check(Pre,X,Loop). |
| 1318 | | |
| 1319 | | tcltk_nested_dfs_goal_cycle_check(Msg) :- |
| 1320 | | nested_dfs_cycle_check(Prefix,State,Loop),!, |
| 1321 | | length(Prefix,LP), length(Loop,LL), |
| 1322 | | ajoin(['GOAL predicate can be satisfied infinitely often, reached state with id ',State, |
| 1323 | | ' after ',LP, ' transitions and loop with ',LL,' transitions.'],Msg). |
| 1324 | | tcltk_nested_dfs_goal_cycle_check('GOAL predicate cannot be satisfied infinitely often.'). |
| 1325 | | |
| 1326 | | |
| 1327 | | :- use_module(probsrc(tools),[start_ms_timer/1, stop_ms_timer_with_msg/2, minimize_lasso/4]). |
| 1328 | | |
| 1329 | | % look for a cycle where infinitely often GOAL holds |
| 1330 | | nested_dfs_cycle_check(Prefix,State,Loop) :- |
| 1331 | | reset_nfs, |
| 1332 | | start_ms_timer(T1), |
| 1333 | | initial_nba_state(NBAInit), |
| 1334 | | (reachable_cycle(root,NBAInit,Prefix,State,Loop) |
| 1335 | | -> |
| 1336 | | stop_ms_timer_with_msg(T1,'Nested-DFS found cycle'), |
| 1337 | | print_state_from_id(State), print(' satisfies GOAL and can be executed infinitely often '),nl, |
| 1338 | | printsilent('Path to state: '),printsilent(Prefix),nls, |
| 1339 | | printsilent('Loop: '),printsilent(Loop),nls, |
| 1340 | | (minimize_lasso(Prefix,Loop,NP,NL), append(NP,NL,Trace), |
| 1341 | | set_counterexample_by_transition_ids(Trace) |
| 1342 | | -> true ; add_error(nested_dfs_cycle_check,'Could not set counter example:',Prefix)) |
| 1343 | | ; |
| 1344 | | stop_ms_timer_with_msg(T1,'Nested-DFS found no cycle'), |
| 1345 | | format('No infinite loop with state statisfying GOAL found~n',[]),fail |
| 1346 | | ). |
| 1347 | | |
| 1348 | | |
| 1349 | | :- use_module(probsrc(state_space),[impl_trans_id/4, set_counterexample_by_transition_ids/1]). |
| 1350 | | |
| 1351 | | % Implementation of Algorithm 8 from Modelchecking Book |
| 1352 | | |
| 1353 | | reachable_cycle(From,NBA,_,_,_) :- outer_visited(From,NBA),!,fail. |
| 1354 | | reachable_cycle(From,NBA,[Action1|T],State,Loop) :- assert_outer_visited(From,NBA), |
| 1355 | | % format('Processing edges for ~w~n',[From]), |
| 1356 | | b_nba_transition(From,NBA,Action1,To1,NBA1), |
| 1357 | | reachable_cycle(To1,NBA1,T,State,Loop). |
| 1358 | | reachable_cycle(From,NBA,[],From,Loop) :- |
| 1359 | | accepting_state(NBA,From), |
| 1360 | | % we now look for a cycle back to From |
| 1361 | | Loop = [_|_], |
| 1362 | | %format('Finished processing edges for ~w, GOAL satisfied, looking for cycle.~n',[From]), |
| 1363 | | cycle_check(From,NBA,Loop,From,NBA). |
| 1364 | | |
| 1365 | | cycle_check(From,NBA,[],From,NBA) :- !. % Loop found |
| 1366 | | cycle_check(From,NBA,_,_,_) :- inner_visited(From,NBA),!,fail. % already explored |
| 1367 | | cycle_check(From,NBA,[ActionID|TLoop],TargetB,TargetNBA) :- assert_inner_visited(From,NBA), |
| 1368 | | % format('Looking for cycle from ~w to target ~w : ~w~n',[From,TargetB,TargetNBA]), |
| 1369 | | b_nba_transition(From,NBA,ActionID,ToB,ToNBA), |
| 1370 | | cycle_check(ToB,ToNBA,TLoop,TargetB,TargetNBA). |
| 1371 | | |
| 1372 | | b_nba_transition(FromB,FromNBA,ActionID,ToB,ToNBA) :- |
| 1373 | | impl_trans_id(FromB,Term1,ActionID,ToB), |
| 1374 | | nba_trans(FromNBA,Term1,ToB,ToNBA). |
| 1375 | | |
| 1376 | | |
| 1377 | | % NBA: Non-Deterministic Büchi Automata |
| 1378 | | |
| 1379 | | % TODO: make dynamic and flexible |
| 1380 | | |
| 1381 | | :- use_module(probsrc(model_checker),[node_satisfies_goal/1]). |
| 1382 | | initial_nba_state(1). |
| 1383 | | nba_trans(1,_,_,1). % :- print(A),nl. |
| 1384 | | accepting_state(_,From) :- node_satisfies_goal(From). % look for GF GOAL |
| 1385 | | |
| 1386 | | %nba_trans(1,_,To,Dest) :- (node_satisfies_goal(To) -> Dest=2 ; Dest=1). |
| 1387 | | %nba_trans(2,_,_,2). |
| 1388 | | %accepting_state(2,_). % look for F GOAL |
| 1389 | | |
| 1390 | | % example NBA for Mutex.mch |
| 1391 | | %nba_trans(1,'RequestCS'(int(1)),R) :- !, R=2. |
| 1392 | | %nba_trans(1,_,_,1). |
| 1393 | | %nba_trans(2,'EnterCS'(int(1)),_,R) :- !, fail. |
| 1394 | | %nba_trans(2,_,_,2). |
| 1395 | | %accepting_state(2,_). |
| 1396 | | % one could also use a CSP || B process; |
| 1397 | | % but: CSP||B: cannot store B states independently (w/o CSP) because CSP process prunes and sets parameters |